10-26-2011 05:04 AM - edited 03-11-2019 02:42 PM
Hello,
According to the ASA logs, a lot of dns packets (from root dns servers) are dropped because they exceed the limit of 512 bytes (size limit fixed in dns inspection).
It seems corresponding to DNSSEC packet.
Which value should I use for the DNS packet size limit ?
Some say 1024, others 4096...
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-27-2011 10:00 AM
Hello Armand,
It would be more secure to work with the 1024, you can give it a try to that one and check if you keep getting DNS packets denied.
Here is one of the fix released from Cisco regarding the DNSSEC packet size:
policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum client auto
If EDNS is used, the above command will allow DNS replies up to the length specified in the OPT record.
Regards,
Julio
10-27-2011 02:15 AM
Any idea ?
Thanks
10-27-2011 10:00 AM
Hello Armand,
It would be more secure to work with the 1024, you can give it a try to that one and check if you keep getting DNS packets denied.
Here is one of the fix released from Cisco regarding the DNSSEC packet size:
policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum client auto
If EDNS is used, the above command will allow DNS replies up to the length specified in the OPT record.
Regards,
Julio
02-24-2012 01:02 AM
I tried this :
policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum client auto
But nothing has changed... I still have dropped UDP DNS replies..
Any idea ?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide