01-13-2017 05:55 AM - edited 03-12-2019 01:46 AM
Dear All ,
We wish to upgrade our Cisco Cisco ASA 5512-X Adaptive Security Appliance
Product ID : ASA5512-MB.
We would like to be sure that : After buying and activating :
ASA5512-SEC-PL
ASA 5512-X Sec. Plus Lic. w/ HA, Sec Ctxt, more VLAN + Conns
Are we able to use our ASA 5512X as load balancing two Isp and
port mapping into one MailServer located inside network.
Two Isp Connected to ASA Outside Interfaces and nat-port mapping into
Single mailserver connected to ASA inside interface.
Example : 92.45.45.45 ISP1 MX 10 ------nat 192.168.1.10
88.55.55.55 ISP2 MX 10 ------nat 192.168.1.10
Thank you in advance very much
Best Regards,
Mesut
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-13-2017 07:21 AM
You need NAT-statements for both interfaces:
object SRV.MAIL-NAT-OUTSIDE1
host 192.168.1.10
nat (inside,outside1) static 92.45.45.45
!
object SRV.MAIL-NAT-OUTSIDE2
host 192.168.1.10
nat (inside,outside2) static 88.55.55.55
On both
access-list OUTSIDE-IN permit tcp any host 192.168.1.10 eq 25
!
access-group OUTSIDE.IN in interface outside1
access-group OUTSIDE.IN in interface outside2
You also need static default routes to both next hops with a higher administrative Distance on the secondary ISP. At least the first one is very likely already configured:
route outside1 0 0 NH-ISP1 1
route outside2 0 0 NH-ISP1 100
That's all!
01-13-2017 07:36 AM
No.
ASAs do not support ISP load balancing in the way I think you want with any version of software or license.
What Karsten described works fine but I understood you to be asking for a real time load balancing based on the ASA feature. The scheme he described depends on external clients calling one or the other address - not a single MX record with two entries.
01-13-2017 06:41 AM
For that to work, you don't need the SEC-PLUS license. That also works with the BASE-license.
01-13-2017 07:02 AM
Thanks Karsten ,
That also works with the BASE-license.
Could you please advise with a sample config or some steps ?
01-13-2017 07:21 AM
You need NAT-statements for both interfaces:
object SRV.MAIL-NAT-OUTSIDE1
host 192.168.1.10
nat (inside,outside1) static 92.45.45.45
!
object SRV.MAIL-NAT-OUTSIDE2
host 192.168.1.10
nat (inside,outside2) static 88.55.55.55
On both
access-list OUTSIDE-IN permit tcp any host 192.168.1.10 eq 25
!
access-group OUTSIDE.IN in interface outside1
access-group OUTSIDE.IN in interface outside2
You also need static default routes to both next hops with a higher administrative Distance on the secondary ISP. At least the first one is very likely already configured:
route outside1 0 0 NH-ISP1 1
route outside2 0 0 NH-ISP1 100
That's all!
01-13-2017 07:31 AM
Hi Karsten ,
Many thanks for your great assist and support. I wil try your config steps and let you know about
this.
Best wishes
Mesut
01-13-2017 07:36 AM
No.
ASAs do not support ISP load balancing in the way I think you want with any version of software or license.
What Karsten described works fine but I understood you to be asking for a real time load balancing based on the ASA feature. The scheme he described depends on external clients calling one or the other address - not a single MX record with two entries.
01-13-2017 07:39 AM
Hello Marvin ,
Thanks for your input . I am really confused between you and Karsten Iwen ?
Have ever tried and configured your ASA for load balancing senario ?
If so what was your results ?
Thanks a lot for those assisting here for my issue.
Best wishes to all :)
01-13-2017 07:43 AM
Hi Marvin,
well, at least that was what I understood from the question with two different IPs for the two ISP. For
01-13-2017 07:45 AM
Hi Karsten,
Indeed - if we throw out the "load balancing" term you are 100% correct.
01-13-2017 07:55 AM
Hi Karsten and Marvin ,
My need is for our mailserver :
Able to send and receive emails from outside internet domains. with two public ip registered
ISP1 and ISP2 dns servers for ourdomain.com with the same value of MX record 10 .
If the link of ISP1 fails email relaying and sending for our domain will be able to continue from the ISP2 link.
I think what I need is much more like link redundency refer to load balancing.
If so what could be the right config example for me ?
Please advise
Thanks
Mesut
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide