07-17-2015 03:09 PM - edited 03-11-2019 11:17 PM
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-17-2015 04:43 PM
Hello Jonathan,
Question? is the guest network going to be behind a new interface?
If that is the case and the security level is higher than the public interface you will need only to setup NAT.
If you already have a global command and you want to use the same public IP for the NAT the configuration will look something like this.
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0
NAT (guest-network) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
Global (outside) 1 interface
07-17-2015 04:43 PM
Hello Jonathan,
Question? is the guest network going to be behind a new interface?
If that is the case and the security level is higher than the public interface you will need only to setup NAT.
If you already have a global command and you want to use the same public IP for the NAT the configuration will look something like this.
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0
NAT (guest-network) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
Global (outside) 1 interface
07-18-2015 04:20 PM
The guest network is on a sub interface vlan on the firewall.
Do I need to make it different port instead of a vlan interface?
Thanks
07-21-2015 09:53 AM
Hello Jonathan,
When you create an interface or sub interface that will be a separate area. That means that you will need to create NAT and a new set of rules for it. (ej sec level nameif nat access-groups)
The example that I provided you still applies if you are using sub interfaces instead of the physical interface.
Regards,
Jose Orozco.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide