07-25-2024 05:57 AM
It's probably a stupid question..
In FMC, when creating route-based S2S VPN (thus using static VTI), why is full mesh is grayed out? Could it be done if all the devices participating in the full-mesh VPN were managed by FMC?
Thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-25-2024 06:27 AM
@cpaquet Full Mesh is for crypto map based VPN, not VTI (P2P) or DVTI (hub and spoke). According to Cisco presenter at Cisco live earlier this year DVTI will not be developed for Full Mesh either, you'd have to route through the hub to another spoke or use another solution (DMVPN, FlexVPN etc).
07-25-2024 06:05 AM - edited 07-25-2024 05:43 PM
MHM
07-25-2024 06:27 AM
@cpaquet Full Mesh is for crypto map based VPN, not VTI (P2P) or DVTI (hub and spoke). According to Cisco presenter at Cisco live earlier this year DVTI will not be developed for Full Mesh either, you'd have to route through the hub to another spoke or use another solution (DMVPN, FlexVPN etc).
07-25-2024 05:44 PM
Thanks Rob. So, I guess that it could be done, but it wont be done... similar to why DMVPN is only available on routers and not on Firewall? probably a question of sales, leave some features exclusive to routers. Thanks for the prompt and concise reply.
07-25-2024 06:03 PM
Full mesh meaning all to all
Partial mesh with VTI is done via hub and spoke using dvti.
The different is only spoke to spoke traffic is not direct it need to pass through hub ftd.
MHM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide