12-20-2019 08:54 PM
For those familiar with both FTD and FPR, which features did FPR lost that FTD had, and which features did FPR gained that FTD did not had?
While the traditional, pure L3 Cisco ASA still has its niche and it is very well known by the security community, Cisco FTD was Cisco's entry into the L7 firewall realm. Of course, you could extend your traditional ASA with the NGFW parallel image, but this was not on par with the competition, neither was an elegant solution for this new problem. FTD was L7 centric with L3 capabilities included. Long story short, it is safe to say it is mostly clear what ASA, ASA+NGFW and FTD are, its distinctions, limitations and functionalities. Then Cisco decided to begin FTD retirement, with FPR in its place. At first, FPR looks like a much needed improved version of FTD: faster, more scalable, more affordable and overall competitive. It brings the core features of FTD: L7 capabilities, central management (via FMC), IPS, AMP for Networks, URL filtering, SSL decryption.
Is the above a correct statement?
12-20-2019 09:46 PM
I'm not sure what you're asking. There is no Cisco product known as FPR.
There are currently:
1. Classic ASA (running on ASA or Firepower appliances or as a VM)
2. ASA with Firepower service module (running only on ASA hardware)
3. Firepower appliances (or VM) running Firepower OS (previous Sourcefire product).
4. Firepower Threat Defense software (running on ASA or Firepower appliances or as a VM).
12-29-2019 01:50 AM
12-30-2019 06:36 AM
Firepower hardware appliances, including the 1100, 2100, 4100 and 9300 series are all able to run ASA code. Some of them weren't initially but that has changed.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide