IDSM2 (5.0) Implementation

[coredumpbp]

Hi everyone,

I have the following case:

2 x Cat6509 (HSRP master and slave)

2 x IDSM blades (v5.0 - 229)

each Cat has his own IDSM blade install online (not inline), with 2 monitoring sessions on each Cat.

There is any way to monitor traffic over 600 Mbps in those 2 different blades?

Regards,

[Fernando_Meza]

The IDSM only can process 600 Mbps. You could perhaps divide the load by inspecting different VLANs on each IDSM using access maps.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008007e70d.html#wp1055516

I hope it helps .. Please rate it if it does !!!

[commteam100]

uuuTt

[coredumpbp]

I have doubts that 2 IDSM2 blades can’t cover traffic around 300 Mbps as I can’t get from the SNMP statistics. That’s way I was asking how 2 blades can be configure without having problem with interVLAN traffic.

FYI

evStatus: eventId=1136715333146415062 vendor=Cisco

originator:

hostId: Cisco-IDSM2-1

appName: interface

appInstanceId: 425

time: June 7, 2006 7:34:01 AM UTC offset=180 timeZone=GMT+02:00

netInterfaceMissedPacketThresholdExceeded:

description: GigabitEthernet0/7 : Missed-packet threshold was exceeded. 912% of packets were missed.

interfaceName: GigabitEthernet0/7

Rgds

[coredumpbp]

I have doubts that 2 IDSM2 blades can’t cover traffic around 300 Mbps as I can’t get from the SNMP statistics. That’s way I was asking how 2 blades can be configure without having problem with interVLAN traffic.

FYI

evStatus: eventId=1136715333146415062 vendor=Cisco

originator:

hostId: Cisco-IDSM2-1

appName: interface

appInstanceId: 425

time: June 7, 2006 7:34:01 AM UTC offset=180 timeZone=GMT+02:00

netInterfaceMissedPacketThresholdExceeded:

description: GigabitEthernet0/7 : Missed-packet threshold was exceeded. 912% of packets were missed.

interfaceName: GigabitEthernet0/7

Rgds

[kotek]

Hi

all depends on your topology.

- if it's possible you can make 1st Cat be master for 1st half of routed vlans, 2nd Cat for 2nd half splitting traffic load between chasis and two IDSMs

or

- try to play with span/rspan/vacl redirects,

dcsrnd.pdf is your friend

tk