03-05-2015 03:34 AM - edited 03-11-2019 10:35 PM
Hello All,
It seems that there are two methods in Cisco ASA to do the interVLAN routing as below:
1-
Interface Gi 0/0
switport mode truck
switchport allowed vlan 1,2
int vlan 1
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
Int vlan 2
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
no shut
2-
Interface Gi 0/0
no ip
no shut
int Gi 0/0.1
vlan 1
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
int Gi 0/0.2
vlan 2
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
no shut
Are these methods provide the same functionality/result? Which one is better and why? I want to implement an inter-vlan routing on 9.2.3.
Thanks,
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-05-2015 04:08 AM
As far as I am aware the use of vlan interfaces is only for the ASA 5505.
Any other model of ASA uses subinterfaces and a trunk connection.
So it depends on your model as to which you use.
Jon
03-05-2015 04:08 AM
As far as I am aware the use of vlan interfaces is only for the ASA 5505.
Any other model of ASA uses subinterfaces and a trunk connection.
So it depends on your model as to which you use.
Jon
03-06-2015 11:41 PM
Thanks Jon yes you are right.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide