cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
882
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

lots of static....

danilodicesare
Level 1
Level 1

Hi all,

do you think i can do a stuff like that with FWSM:

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 2020 192.168.0.1 2020 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 3030 192.168.0.1 3030 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 4040 192.168.0.1 4040 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 5050 10.1.1.1 5050 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

first 3 static with no_real_nat same address same port, 4 static real nat, outside same ip address then first 3 static inside another mapping.

thk

Das

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

ajagadee
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Das,

Yes, this should be possible on the FWSM. Loaded the above configuration on a FWSM and it took it without any issue.

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 2020 192.168.0.1 2020 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 3030 192.168.0.1 3030 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 4040 192.168.0.1 4040 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 5050 10.1.1.1 5050 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

Regards,

Arul

*Pls rate if it helps*

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2

ajagadee
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Das,

Yes, this should be possible on the FWSM. Loaded the above configuration on a FWSM and it took it without any issue.

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 2020 192.168.0.1 2020 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 3030 192.168.0.1 3030 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 4040 192.168.0.1 4040 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.0.1 5050 10.1.1.1 5050 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

Regards,

Arul

*Pls rate if it helps*

of course i'll rate :)

BR

Das

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card