cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2538
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

LU allocate connection failed on ASA5585

huang.jeff
Level 1
Level 1

We saw this syslog on ASA5585 with version 8.4(1). I have two HA firewall pairs (contains 4 ASA5585, active/standby), and I saw this message on the standby ones.

Jun  7 07:36:26 10.99.96.32 last message repeated 4 times

Jun  7 07:36:26  10.99.96.32 :Jun 07 07:36:26 HKST: %ASA-ha-3-210005: LU allocate connection  failed

Jun  7 07:36:26 10.99.96.32 :Jun 07 07:36:26 HKST: %ASA-ha-3-210005:  LU allocate connection failed

Jun  7 07:36:26 10.99.96.32 last message  repeated 14 times

Jun  7 07:42:28 10.99.96.32 :Jun 07 07:42:28 HKST:  %ASA-ha-3-210005: LU allocate connection failed

Jun  7 07:42:28  10.99.96.32 last message repeated 10 times

Jun  7 07:42:28 10.99.96.32 :Jun  07 07:42:28 HKST: %ASA-ha-3-210005: LU allocate connection failed

I also found two bugs about this message, CSCsh80889 and CSCsb98925, and from the bug infomation, it should be fixed in previous version.

FW14A-Z5J04-96-31/sec/stby# show mem detail

Free memory:                     10936096992 bytes (85%)

Used memory:

Allocated memory in use:     552720160 bytes ( 4%)

Reserved memory:           1396084736 bytes  (11%)

-----------------------------   ----------------

Total  memory:                   12884901888 bytes (100%)

Least free memory:      10934684752 bytes (85%)

Most used memory:      1950217136 bytes (15%)

And it looked not like a hardware problem. Is this still a bug?

thanks

Jeff Huang

4 Replies 4

Kureli Sankar
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

CSCte80027 - but should be resolved in 8.4.1

With the new code, I'd suggest opening a TAC case.

-KS

Hi Sankar,

Thanks for your reply.

This message shows on both standby ASA5585, I think that it should not be a hardware issue and might be a bug. Do you have any recommend actions for troubleshoot before I open a TAC case, such as "debug fover fail".

Jeff

Both standby ASAs? You have two failover pairs?

At this point it appears to be a new defect that we may not have seen. 

It may be cosmetic for all you know.

May be short lived conns by the time we get to replicate these to the standby they are torn down on the active unit.

It appears that the conns are unable to replicate from the active to the standby.

Is the unit low on memory? Debugs will be good but, depending on how much traffic the unit is pumping, it may be too much or spike the CPU.

Have the TAC engineer open a defect if needed and take it from there.

-Kureli

Yes, we had two failover pairs and this message appears in both standby ASAs.

Thanks for your reply and suggestions.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card