01-05-2007 07:18 AM - edited 03-11-2019 02:15 AM
I have been tasked with migrating a couple routers with ACLs to FWSMs on a 7600.
My question is - except for the interface IDs can I just copy the existing ACLs from the Router to the FWSM? Will that work? Or do I have to create a brand new rule set?
Thanks
Jeff
01-05-2007 07:48 AM
Firstly the router acls will probably be using inverse masks
eg. permit tcp 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.1.1 eq www
Pix rulesets don't use inverse masks so it would be
permit tcp 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.1.1 eq www.
Secondly it also depends on what lines are actually in your acl. If there are lines with the established keyword for example you wouldn't need this on the FWSM as you are now dealing with a fully stateful firewall.
You also need to be aware of the NAT statements you may well need but without knwoing your topology it is difficult to comment.
HTH
01-05-2007 08:04 AM
HTH,
Thank you. That is good advice.
So, other than those caveats, I should be able to copy them over and go?
01-05-2007 07:30 PM
yes you should be fine.
I would stress that you may well need NAT statements on the FWSM (if you are running it in routed mode) otherwise access will denied.
To apply the access-list to the interface you use a slightly different command -
access-group "access-list name" in interface "interface name".
By the way HTH is shorthand for Hope this Helps :-)
01-10-2007 08:28 PM
I think 3.1(4) allows you to disable using NAT. It might even be disabled by default.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide