02-19-2011 06:53 PM - edited 03-11-2019 12:53 PM
In 8.3 and beyond, how do I NAT to both the outside and the dmz?
When I try this it complains
object network inside-network
nat (inside, any) dynamic interface
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-19-2011 07:15 PM
Hi,
Hope this helps. Please reply if you need further assistance.
Regards,
Chirag
P.S.: Please mark this thread as answered if you feel your query is answered. Do.rate helpful posts.
02-19-2011 07:48 PM
Hi,
Here is a very good dcument that will elaborate on the pre 8.3 and new 8.3 nat statements.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-9129
This is should help if you are familiar with pre-8.3 NAT.
The following link gives you details of nat statements in 8.3
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa83/upgrading/migrating.html#wp83968
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Chirag
P.S.: Please mark this thread as answered if you feel your query is answered. Do.rate helpful posts.
02-19-2011 07:51 PM
Yes, identity nat will help.
You can configure nat(inside,dmz) source static obj-inside obj-inside destination static obj-dmz obj-dmz
Also, you will require access-list in inward direction on dmz interface to allow traffic to inside network.
Regards,
Chirag
02-19-2011 07:15 PM
Hi,
Hope this helps. Please reply if you need further assistance.
Regards,
Chirag
P.S.: Please mark this thread as answered if you feel your query is answered. Do.rate helpful posts.
02-19-2011 07:34 PM
Thanks for your reply.
I can see that would work, yet it looks awkward.
It's hard to imagine the designers of the new NAT would have it that way, so maybe I'm not asking the right question.
Here is my scenario:
A. these are still not correct or optimally implemented:
dmz hosts need to contact inside hosts
inside hosts need to contact dmz hosts
B. these are done and have been tested:
inside hosts need to contact outside hosts
object network inside-network
nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface
dmz hosts need to contact outside hosts
object network dmz-network
nat (dmz,outside) dynamic interface
outside hosts need to contact dmz hosts
object network server1
nat (dmz,outside) static 24.a.b.c
outside hosts need to contact inside hosts
object network server2
nat (inside,outside) static 24.x.y.z
can you show my a more elegant way to use 8.3 nat to accomplish my scenario?
02-19-2011 07:38 PM
My follow up question is for part A do I need to change the addresses at all?
Should I just be doing identity nat?
How do I decide when I need to hide private addresses from each other?
02-19-2011 07:48 PM
Hi,
Here is a very good dcument that will elaborate on the pre 8.3 and new 8.3 nat statements.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-9129
This is should help if you are familiar with pre-8.3 NAT.
The following link gives you details of nat statements in 8.3
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa83/upgrading/migrating.html#wp83968
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Chirag
P.S.: Please mark this thread as answered if you feel your query is answered. Do.rate helpful posts.
02-19-2011 07:51 PM
Yes, identity nat will help.
You can configure nat(inside,dmz) source static obj-inside obj-inside destination static obj-dmz obj-dmz
Also, you will require access-list in inward direction on dmz interface to allow traffic to inside network.
Regards,
Chirag
02-19-2011 09:09 PM
thanks. this is what I used
nat (inside,dmz) source static any any
02-19-2011 09:33 PM
Gr8
I'm glad the issue is resolved.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide