lcaruso
Level 6
Level 6
Member since ‎10-22-2001
‎03-13-2024

User Statistics

  • 1089 Posts
  • 10 Solutions
  • 470 Helpful votes Given
  • 119 Helpful votes Received
Recent Badges
100 Helpful Vote
1 Accepted Solution
5 Accepted Solution
50 Replies
20 Replies
10 Replies
5 Replies
 30 Helpful Vote
10 Helpful Vote
1 Helpful Vote

User Activity

Hi, I am looking for a better redundancy outcome, not to mention better understanding, given this scenario just experienced. A pair of SSO 9800-40s connected to a par of 9606s in SVL where a port channel member on the core side connecting to the acti...
Over the last several weeks, we have attempted to spin up new cloud controllers. One issue that held us up was our virtual account not showing up for provisioning. Then we inadvertently selected a dedicated host instead of shared so then were request...
Hi,I am planning a new core cutover for a HA pair of campus 9800-40s using the RMI+RP redundancy model.The connections to new cores will increase the number of active trunk ports on each 9800 from 2 to 4.To add those members, I will have to shut the ...
We are planning a migration from 4507 VSS cores to 9606 SVL cores. I have seen posts about VSS to VSS domain MEC interconnections and SVL to SVL domain interconnections, but do not know if the underlying technology differences if any would prevent me...
Hi,We have 9606R switches with C9600-LC-24C line cards running 17.09.04a using QSFP-100G-FR-S transceivers connected to the 100G ports and they are giving us these errors and not reporting correctly as the 40G ports:*Dec 11 22:03:39.474: %TRANSCEIVER...
Community Statistics
Member Since ‎10-22-2001 08:19 AM
Date Last Visited ‎03-13-2024 12:02 AM
Posts 1,089
Total Helpful Votes Received 119