cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
10391
Views
11
Helpful
3
Replies

'no failover wait-disable' command

johnlloyd_13
Level 9
Level 9

hi,

i had a strange issue yesterday where i upgraded an ASA 5555-x active-standby pair to 9.8.4.20 to a patch a recent cisco vulnerability.

both FW got stuck on HA state as 'active' and encountered an 'HA state progression failed'. i did the secondary FW upgrade first which went fine but primary failed and had to do a hard reboot.

i also noticed the new code 9.8.4.20 auto generated the 'no failover wait-disable' command and was wondering if this caused the failure for the FW pair upgrade. i don't see this command documented in cisco website.

i didn't have this issue when i upgraded pair of ASA 5525-X using the same code.

was wondering if anyone had this issue? could this be a bug? 

would like to have an advise while waiting for TAC's reply. TIA!

 

/sec/act# failover reload-standby    <<< HANGED/OUTAGE ON BOTH FW; sec/act BECAME sec/stby

 

------------------ show logging buffered ------------------

 

Jun 25 2020 14:12:41 FW01 : %ASA-6-721002: (WebVPN-Secondary) HA status change: event HA_STATUS_CLIENT_NEGOTIATED_VERSION, my state Active, peer state Failed.

Jun 25 2020 14:12:42 FW01 : %ASA-6-720032: (VPN-Secondary) HA status callback: id=3,seq=200,grp=0,event=406,op=130,my=Active,peer=Active.

Jun 25 2020 14:12:42 FW01 : %ASA-6-720028: (VPN-Secondary) HA status callback: Peer state Active.

Jun 25 2020 14:12:42 FW01 : %ASA-6-721002: (WebVPN-Secondary) HA status change: event HA_STATUS_PEER_STATE, my state Active, peer state Active.

Jun 25 2020 14:12:49 FW01 : %ASA-6-720037: (VPN-Secondary) HA progression callback: id=3,seq=200,grp=0,event=100,op=2,my=Cold Standby,peer=Active.

Jun 25 2020 14:12:49 FW01 : %ASA-6-721003: (WebVPN-Secondary) HA progression change: event HA_PROG_STANDBY_COLD, my state Cold Standby, peer state Active.

Jun 25 2020 14:14:55 FW01 : %ASA-6-720037: (VPN-Secondary) HA progression callback: id=3,seq=200,grp=0,event=100,op=16,my=Cold Standby,peer=Active.

 

 

-----

 

------------------ show failover history ------------------

 

==========================================================================

From State                 To State                   Reason

==========================================================================

14:48:37 UTC Jun 25 2020

Negotiation                Cold Standby               Detected an Active mate

 

14:48:39 UTC Jun 25 2020

Cold Standby               Sync Config                Detected an Active mate

 

14:50:42 UTC Jun 25 2020

Sync Config                Negotiation                HA state progression failed

 

14:50:44 UTC Jun 25 2020

Negotiation                Cold Standby               Detected an Active mate

 

14:50:46 UTC Jun 25 2020

Cold Standby               Sync Config                Detected an Active mate

 

14:52:49 UTC Jun 25 2020

Sync Config                Negotiation                HA state progression failed

 

14:52:50 UTC Jun 25 2020

Negotiation                Cold Standby               Detected an Active mate

 

14:52:52 UTC Jun 25 2020

Cold Standby               Sync Config                Detected an Active mate

 

14:54:55 UTC Jun 25 2020

Sync Config                Negotiation                HA state progression failed

 

14:54:57 UTC Jun 25 2020

Negotiation                Cold Standby               Detected an Active mate

 

14:54:59 UTC Jun 25 2020

Cold Standby               Sync Config                Detected an Active mate

 

14:57:02 UTC Jun 25 2020

Sync Config                Negotiation                HA state progression failed

 

14:57:03 UTC Jun 25 2020

Negotiation                Cold Standby               Detected an Active mate

 

14:57:05 UTC Jun 25 2020

Cold Standby               Sync Config                Detected an Active mate

 

14:59:08 UTC Jun 25 2020

Sync Config                Negotiation                HA state progression failed

 

14:59:10 UTC Jun 25 2020

Negotiation                Cold Standby               Detected an Active mate

 

14:59:12 UTC Jun 25 2020

Cold Standby               Sync Config                Detected an Active mate

 

15:01:15 UTC Jun 25 2020

Sync Config                Negotiation                HA state progression failed

 

15:01:16 UTC Jun 25 2020

Negotiation                Cold Standby               Detected an Active mate

 

15:01:18 UTC Jun 25 2020

Cold Standby               Sync Config                Detected an Active mate

 

 

-----

 

------------------ show failover ------------------

 

Failover On

Failover unit Secondary

Failover LAN Interface: FAILOVER GigabitEthernet0/7 (up)

Reconnect timeout 0:00:00

Unit Poll frequency 1 seconds, holdtime 15 seconds

Interface Poll frequency 5 seconds, holdtime 25 seconds

Interface Policy 1

Monitored Interfaces 15 of 516 maximum

MAC Address Move Notification Interval not set

failover replication http

Version: Ours 9.8(4)20, Mate 9.8(4)20

Serial Number: Ours FCH191zzz Mate FCH193yyy

Last Failover at: 14:09:35 UTC Jun 25 2020

This host: Secondary - Sync Config

Active time: 192 (sec)

slot 0: ASA5555 hw/sw rev (1.0/9.8(4)20) status (Up Sys)

 <SNIP>

Other host: Primary - Active

Active time: 2937 (sec)

slot 0: ASA5555 hw/sw rev (1.0/9.8(4)20) status (Up Sys)

<SNIP>

 

-----

 

SECONDARY FW CONSOLE:

 

/sec/stby#

        Unable to sync configuration from Active

.

        Detected an Active mate

 

sec/stby# conf t    <<< FROM sec/act BECAME sec/stby

**** WARNING ****

        Configuration Replication is NOT performed from Standby unit to Active unit.

        Configurations are no longer synchronized.

sec/stby(config)# failover active

This unit is in syncing state. 'failover' command will not be effective at this time

sec/stby(config)# no failover

This unit is in syncing state. 'failover' command will not be effective at this time

 

-----

 

PRIMARY FW CONSOLE:

 

Username: TACACS-LOGIN

Password: *********

Configuration replication is in progress.  Please try

authentication again when replication completes.

Username: LOCAL-USER

Password: ***********

Configuration replication is in progress.  Please try

authentication again when replication completes.

 

 

-----

 

AFTER PRI FW REBOOT

pri/act# sh run failover
failover
failover lan unit primary
failover lan interface FAILOVER GigabitEthernet0/7
failover key *****
failover replication http
failover interface ip FAILOVER 192.7.1.253 255.255.255.252 standby 192.7.1.254
no failover wait-disable

 

pri/act# ping 192.7.1.254
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.27.1.254, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms

 

pri/act# conf t
pri/act(config)# no failover ?

configure mode commands/options:
group Configure/Enable failover group
health-check Failover unit health check enable/disable
interface Configure the IP address to be used for failover and/or
stateful update information
interface-policy Set the policy for failover due to interface failures
ipsec Configure the use of IPSec tunnel for failover
key Configure the failover shared secret or key
lan Specify the unit as primary or secondary or configure the
interface and vlan to be used for failover communication
link Configure the interface and vlan to be used as a link for
stateful update information
mac Specify the virtual mac address for a physical interface
mac-notification Configure failover MAC address movement notification
settings
polltime Configure failover poll interval
replication Enable HTTP (port 80) connection replication
standby Execute command in standby
timeout Specify the failover reconnect timeout value for
asymmetrically routed sessions
wait-disable Disable switchover waiting for peer state
<cr>

exec mode commands/options:
active Make this system to be the active unit of the failover pair

3 Replies 3

after the upgrade to version 9.12(3)9, we do the below logs from ASA intermittently.

Jun 28 2020 06:49:33: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.02
Jun 28 2020 06:49:33: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.03
Jun 28 2020 06:49:33: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest-Inside
Jun 28 2020 06:49:33: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.04
Jun 28 2020 06:50:14: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.04
Jun 28 2020 06:50:49: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.03
Jun 28 2020 06:50:49: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest-Inside
Jun 28 2020 06:50:49: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.04
Jun 28 2020 06:51:29: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.01
Jun 28 2020 06:51:29: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.03
Jun 28 2020 06:51:29: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest-Inside
Jun 28 2020 06:51:29: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.04
Jun 28 2020 06:52:15: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.02
Jun 28 2020 06:52:15: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.03
Jun 28 2020 06:52:15: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest-Inside
Jun 28 2020 06:52:55: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.02
Jun 28 2020 06:52:55: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.03
Jun 28 2020 06:52:55: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest-Inside
Jun 28 2020 06:52:55: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.04
Jun 28 2020 06:53:36: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.03
Jun 28 2020 06:54:12: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.03
Jun 28 2020 06:54:12: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest-Inside
Jun 28 2020 06:54:12: %ASA-1-105005: (Primary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface Guest.INT.RTR.04

 

H-INT-Guest-FW-A/pri/act# sh run failover
failover
failover lan unit primary
failover lan interface FAILOVER Port-channel47
failover key *****
failover replication http
failover link FAILOVER Port-channel47
failover interface ip FAILOVER 10.160.X.X 255.255.255.252 standby 10.160.X.X


no failover wait-disable--->New Line added in ASA .

Not sure whether this causing the issue

Anupam Pavithran
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

"no failover wait-disable “

ASA CLI reference guide as of now there is no mention for this command.

This command was introduced as a fix for another bug switchover taking delay when bridge group feature and IPv6 DAD is configured

 

Old behavior: If IPv6 DAD and bridge group feature are enabled, then switchover might take 2secs delay.

 

New behavior: The above mentioned delay can be skipped with "failover wait-disable" CLI command.

This command is added since 9.8.4(16)

 

Here is the documentation bug.

https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvu24709

ChrisNewnham_
Level 1
Level 1

So I just upgraded an ASA 5585X pair  9.12(3) → 9.12.4.67

It's in L2 mode with a BVI configured.

After coming back, the command "no failover wait-disable" had been added. The firewalls were constantly failing over active/standby, even the one that wasn't upgraded initially.

I shut down a port to an upstream switch to one of the devices from the switch end, which calmed it down (seemed to be spanning tree issues). 

I then added the command "failover wait-disable" and suddenly, everything worked again! Unbelievable Jeff.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card