cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2166
Views
5
Helpful
15
Replies

QoS!!!

riju
Level 1
Level 1

Hi All

I have configured QoS for particular ports 1494 and 1604, but not sure whether the QoS is working correctly or not.

Below are the setting details.

Does the class-map match-all default override my class-map match-all metaframe?

I was confused because, in my log server, I see lot of traffic for port 1494, but the counters for access-list 111 is not showing that much.

Can some body please tell, what can be the problem?

!

!

class-map match-all metaframe

description Mataframe applications are marked

match access-group 111

class-map match-all default

description Marking all the traffic

match any

!

!

policy-map metaframe-map

class metaframe

shape peak 384000

bandwidth 384

!

!

interface Serial0/0

service-policy output metaframe-map

!

!

access-list 111 permit tcp any any eq 1494

access-list 111 permit udp any any eq 1604

!

!

test#show access-lists 111

Extended IP access list 111

permit tcp any any eq 1494 (5571 matches)

permit udp any any eq 1604 (2 matches)

test#

test#show policy-map interface serial 0/0

Serial0/0

Service-policy output: metaframe-map

Class-map: metaframe (match-all)

5312 packets, 253681 bytes

5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps

Match: access-group 111

Traffic Shaping

Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment Adapt

Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes) Active

768000 2400 9600 9600 25 2400 -

Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes Shaping

Depth Delayed Delayed Active

0 5310 253585 0 0 no

Weighted Fair Queueing

Output Queue: Conversation 266

Bandwidth 384 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)

(pkts matched/bytes matched) 5312/253681

(depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0

Class-map: class-default (match-any)

1202077 packets, 57081765 bytes

5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps

Match: any

test#

test#show policy-map metaframe-map

Policy Map metaframe-map

Class metaframe

Traffic Shaping

Peak Rate Traffic Shaping

CIR 384000 (bps) Max. Buffers Limit 1000 (Packets)

Weighted Fair Queueing

Bandwidth 384 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)

test#

test#show class-map

Class Map match-any class-default (id 0)

Match any

Class Map match-all metaframe (id 2)

Description: Mataframe applications are marked

Match access-group 111

Class Map match-all default (id 3)

Description: Marking all the traffic

Match any

test#

-Rcp

15 Replies 15

Now, I understand your point. Very true. I have been under the assumption that Riju's network is not using voice/video on IP. That's why I gave the option of prioritizing the metaframe packets. There is only 1 priority class in the network. If there are V/VoIP, noone should mix data traffic with voice in the priority queue.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card