cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
594
Views
3
Helpful
7
Replies

Show route shows empty on the new ASA but shows on the current ASA

channange
Level 1
Level 1

Hope you can help me. I’m replacing an ASA hardware with multiple context. Iif I run show route on each context on the current firewalls, it shows static and connected routes. But looking at the cfg file file, the rstatic route and connected route is not there. Now, since I copy the cfg file, the other routes on the routing table in the current asa is not on my new firewall when show route is issued. Is it hidden somewhere?

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

@channange enable the interfaces so there are "up" then you should see the routes as expected.

View solution in original post

7 Replies 7

@channange have you allocated the physical interfaces to the context and are the interfaces "up"?

@Rob Ingram I’ve created port channels with and assigned to those interfaces. Those port chanels have sub interfaces with their vlans and assigned to context, i.e port-channel1.652. I looked at those routes again, it’s local and connected routes that are missing. Think because interfaces and port- channels are still down. Is that right?. But then ‘Show route’ does not show my static route either. Only shows in ‘show run | i route. What’s the difference?

@channange enable the interfaces so there are "up" then you should see the routes as expected.

@Rob Ingram thanks. I can’t do it until cutover. I will keep you posted. Many thanks for taking time to reply.

cfg file is config file so the connected/direct not appear in this file 
NOW 
for static, are you talking about setroute static route ? if Yes then also these static route not appear in cfg, it dynamic add as static to routing table

Thanks for your reply.

can I know what was issue here and how UP solve it 
thanks alot 
MHM

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card