07-05-2023 12:00 PM
Hope you can help me. I’m replacing an ASA hardware with multiple context. Iif I run show route on each context on the current firewalls, it shows static and connected routes. But looking at the cfg file file, the rstatic route and connected route is not there. Now, since I copy the cfg file, the other routes on the routing table in the current asa is not on my new firewall when show route is issued. Is it hidden somewhere?
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-05-2023 11:55 PM
@channange enable the interfaces so there are "up" then you should see the routes as expected.
07-05-2023 12:30 PM
@channange have you allocated the physical interfaces to the context and are the interfaces "up"?
07-05-2023 11:33 PM
@Rob Ingram I’ve created port channels with and assigned to those interfaces. Those port chanels have sub interfaces with their vlans and assigned to context, i.e port-channel1.652. I looked at those routes again, it’s local and connected routes that are missing. Think because interfaces and port- channels are still down. Is that right?. But then ‘Show route’ does not show my static route either. Only shows in ‘show run | i route. What’s the difference?
07-05-2023 11:55 PM
@channange enable the interfaces so there are "up" then you should see the routes as expected.
07-06-2023 01:06 AM
@Rob Ingram thanks. I can’t do it until cutover. I will keep you posted. Many thanks for taking time to reply.
07-06-2023 01:14 AM
cfg file is config file so the connected/direct not appear in this file
NOW
for static, are you talking about setroute static route ? if Yes then also these static route not appear in cfg, it dynamic add as static to routing table
07-06-2023 06:36 AM
Thanks for your reply.
07-06-2023 06:46 AM
can I know what was issue here and how UP solve it
thanks alot
MHM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide