07-29-2014 10:27 AM - edited 03-11-2019 09:33 PM
I have config on ASA 9.1.3 with User Authentication via RADIUS ACS 5.5.
On one ASA interface i have 5 permits inbound
permit ip dest A
permit ip dest B
permit ip dest C
permit ip dest D
permit ip dest E
On the ACS i have two downloadable ACEs for a user :
permit ip dest F
permit ip dest G
In case i do not use per-user override option in access-group syntax, a packet needs to be
matched on interface AND on downloadable ACL.
In my case dest A to G will not work.
In case i do use per -user override option in access-group syntax, a packet needs to be
matched only on downloadable ACL.
In my case dest F and G will work.
I did not find a way to merge both interface and downloadable ACL.
Requirement would be that without User Auth, A to E works.
In case User authenticates F and G work in ADDITION to A and E.
07-30-2014 04:57 PM
Hello,
How they work is :
-Without the user-override option:
Both ACLs (Configured on the FW and the ACS) will need to permit the traffic.
-With the user-override option:
Only the ACS downloable ACL is check.
Jcarvaja
CCIE 42930, 2xCCNP, JNCIS-SEC
For inmediate support http://iNetworks.cr
07-31-2014 03:37 AM
Hello Jcarvaja,
i did understand what the per user override means and how it works.
Unfortunately it does not give me a solution for my requirement in both options.
My intention was to ask about if there is a possibility to cover my requirement :
I did not find a way to merge both interface and downloadable ACL.
Requirement would be that without User Auth, A to E works.
In case User authenticates F and G work in ADDITION to A and E.
07-31-2014 03:57 AM
Hi,
If you use per-useroverride option, then you have to define everything on the auto/dynamic acl attributes you set in ACS/Radius server.....
If you do not use the per-user-override option then you need to have both interface ACL and Downloadable ACL as same... say it has to have all the 7 permit statements..... on ACL & ACS.
Regards
Karthik
07-31-2014 05:45 AM
Hello Karthik,
thanks for your reply.
"If you use per-useroverride option, then you have to define everything on the auto/dynamic acl attributes you set in ACS/Radius server….."
Yes, but in case I have 500 ACEs on an interface already and need 5 additional per user authentication
i have to hold 505 on the ACS system. This looks very inefficient and is obviously either an ASA
or RADIUS limitation.
"If you do not use the per-user-override option then you need to have both interface ACL and Downloadable ACL as same... say it has to have all the 7 permit statements..... on ACL & ACS."
This does not really make sense to me.
In case i have all the 7 permits already on my interface, why should I bother with
User Authentication to download exactly the same 7 permits to this interface ?
Best regards
Oliver
07-31-2014 06:14 AM
Hi,
Yes. I agree with you for my second suggestion it was supposed to be or not &.... having the same on both doesn't make sense...... But i see those are the limited options.... else you can have the access-restriction on the auth server itself restricted to the 5 hosts NDG/User group... something like that....
Regards
Karthik
Regards
Karthik
07-31-2014 05:24 AM
07-31-2014 05:47 AM
Hello jcarvaja,
Yes, but in case I have 500 ACEs on an ASA interface already and need 5 additional per user authentication
i have to hold 505 on the ACS system. This looks very inefficient and is obviously either an ASA
or RADIUS limitation.
Best regards
Oliver
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide