03-12-2018 12:57 AM - edited 02-21-2020 07:30 AM
Hello all,
Seen cases where nat is done on the border gateway router. Just wondering is there any advantage of creating nat on the firewall as against the BGR?
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-12-2018 10:19 AM
Hi,
Generally speaking, a (medium-sized) router won't have the same NAT performance as a firewall. It's like having a ZBFW config on a router vs install a dedicated firewall. Both do the same thing (filtering up to layer7 - at least for http/ftp and some other clear-text protocols) but don't behave the same in terms of performance.
Now, with the latest 4K routers the penalty is not that big, but a firewall would be best.
Thanks,
Octavian
03-12-2018 08:14 AM
The place you "decide to" do NAT depends on:
- network design
- network constraints like pool of IPs available
- clustering or not
and many many other aspects.
I prefer doing NAT and firewall on ASA while doing pure routing on the BGs. But I had cases when I used ASAs with no NAT, just FW. So it depends from case to case.
03-12-2018 09:08 AM
Any downside or security gap to doing nat on the BGR
03-12-2018 10:19 AM
Hi,
Generally speaking, a (medium-sized) router won't have the same NAT performance as a firewall. It's like having a ZBFW config on a router vs install a dedicated firewall. Both do the same thing (filtering up to layer7 - at least for http/ftp and some other clear-text protocols) but don't behave the same in terms of performance.
Now, with the latest 4K routers the penalty is not that big, but a firewall would be best.
Thanks,
Octavian
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide