cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
583
Views
5
Helpful
3
Replies

Which option nails it for you (Creating NAT on the border gateway router or ASA firewall)

adedipeopeoluwa
Level 1
Level 1

Hello all,

Seen cases where nat is done on the border gateway router. Just wondering is there any advantage of creating nat on the firewall as against the BGR? 

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hi,

Generally speaking, a (medium-sized) router won't have the same NAT performance as a firewall. It's like having a ZBFW config on a router vs install a dedicated firewall. Both do the same thing (filtering up to layer7 - at least for http/ftp and some other clear-text protocols) but don't behave the same in terms of performance.

 

Now, with the latest 4K routers the penalty is not that big, but a firewall would be best.

 

Thanks,

Octavian

View solution in original post

3 Replies 3

Florin Barhala
Level 6
Level 6

The place you "decide to" do NAT depends on:

 - network design

 - network constraints like pool of IPs available

 - clustering or not

 and many many other aspects.

 

I prefer doing NAT and firewall on ASA while doing pure routing on the BGs. But I had cases when I used ASAs with no NAT, just FW. So it depends from case to case.

Any downside or security gap to doing nat on the BGR

Hi,

Generally speaking, a (medium-sized) router won't have the same NAT performance as a firewall. It's like having a ZBFW config on a router vs install a dedicated firewall. Both do the same thing (filtering up to layer7 - at least for http/ftp and some other clear-text protocols) but don't behave the same in terms of performance.

 

Now, with the latest 4K routers the penalty is not that big, but a firewall would be best.

 

Thanks,

Octavian

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card