on
09-08-2021
07:29 PM
- edited on
02-15-2023
08:08 PM
by
Vivien Chia
Q. If I consider to migrate my existing enterprise network to SD-Access to what are the different strategies we have?
A.
Parallel — An SD-Access network is built next to an existing brownfield network. Switches are moved from the brownfield network to the SD-Access network by physically patching cables. This approach makes change management and rollback extremely simple. However, the parallel network requires additional rack space, power, and cabling infrastructure beyond what is currently consumed by the brownfield network.
Incremental — This strategy moves a traditional switch from the brownfield network and converts it to an SD-Access fabric edge node. The Layer 2 Border handoff is a feature used to accomplish this incremental migration. This strategy is appropriate for networks that have equipment capable of supporting SD-Access already in place or where there are environmental constraints such as lack of space and power.
Hybrid—The hybrid approach uses a combination of parallel and incremental approaches. For example, a new pair of core switches are configured as border nodes, control plane nodes are added and configured, and the existing brownfield access switches are converted to SD-Access fabric edge nodes incrementally.
Q. Is There way where I can create SDA fabric with just one physical device acting as Edge, Border and Control all in one?
A. Fabric in a Box is an SD-Access construct where the border node, control plane node, and edge node are running on the same fabric node. This may be a single switch, a switch with hardware stacking, or a StackWise Virtual deployment. The Fabric in a Box Site Reference Model should target less than 200 endpoints.
Q. If I am having a brownfield deployment of SDA, how can I make sure during the migration, host in traditional network and host SDA can communicate with each other?
A. When a traditional network is migrating to an SD-Access network, the Layer 2 Border Handoff is a key strategic feature. Endpoints can remain in place in the traditional network while communication and interaction are tested with the endpoints in the fabric without needing to re-IP address these hosts.
The Layer 2 Border Handoff allows the fabric site and the traditional network VLAN segment to operate using the same subnet. Communication between the two is provided across the border bode with this handoff that provides a VLAN translation between fabric and non-fabric. Cisco DNA Center automates the LISP control plane configuration along with the VLAN translation, Switched Virtual Interface (SVI), and the trunk port connected to the traditional network on this border node.
Q. Should I need Identity service engine (ISE) for SDA deployment?
A. Technically you might be able to create a SDA Fabric without ISE, but that won't be a complete SDA .ISE does the main role of Micro segmentation using SGT, which is one of the crucial features of SDA, you can do just Macro segmentation with VN but you will losing the biggest benefit on SDA .
With regards to the SD-Access solution, it is composed of three parts:
* Identity Services Engine (ISE)
* Cisco DNA Center
* Supported Device Platforms (Routers, Switches, APs, WLCs)
Q. What are the Latency requirement for SDA?
A. Latency in the network is an important consideration for performance, and the RTT between Cisco DNA Center and any network device it manages must be taken into strict account. The RTT should be equal to or less than 100 milliseconds to achieve optimal performance for all solutions provided by Cisco DNA Center including SD-Access. The maximum supported latency is 200ms RTT. Latency between 100ms and 200ms is supported, although longer execution times could be experienced for certain functions including Inventory Collection, Fabric Provisioning, SWIM, and other processes that involve interactions with the managed devices.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: