11-30-2022 02:09 AM - edited 11-30-2022 02:10 AM
I have a big network on which switches are connected with single-mode SFP-LR fiber 10G fiber and only a few are on GE, So I want to implement on uplink ports to mitigate or stop the broadcast traffic as below
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/1
storm-control broadcast level 60.00 50.00
storm-control multicast level 60.00 50.00
storm-control broadcast level bps 50k 40k
storm-control multicast level pps 100 90
storm control action trap
So kindly validate if these parameters(rising and falling thresholds) are enough or if any other suggestion
12-01-2022 01:07 AM
I find this question a bit odd.
if you are concerned about broadcasts on a 10Gig interface, then you should redesign your network
think about segmenting your network using vlan's and routing to limit the size of your broadcast domains
12-01-2022 01:10 AM
12-01-2022 10:16 AM
- In general , I would consider storm control incident based , meaning 'in the beginning' don't use it , invest more in link monitoring tools, use broadcast suppression methods only when needed (after monitoring) ,
M.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide