09-13-2012 03:31 AM - edited 03-01-2019 07:10 AM
Hi all,
I am a problem whereby one of the the routers is not forming bgp peering with one of my nexus.
Please refer to attached diagram.
The reason why it does not form the bgp peering was because it had chosen the wrong bgp route as the best route due to the as-path.
router-5#show ip bgp
BGP table version is 46, local router ID is 192.168.1.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, x best-external, f RT-Filter
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.1.2 0 0 64982 ?
* 10.0.0.14 0 0 64982 64982 ?
*> 10.0.0.8/29 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
router-5#show ip route
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP
+ - replicated route, % - next hop override
Gateway of last resort is not set
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 3 masks
B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 192.168.1.2, 00:02:55
C 10.0.0.8/29 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.901
L 10.0.0.19/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.901
This cause router 2 to not be able to peer with nexus 1 as it does not know how to get to 192.168.1.2. Pinging to Nexus 1(192.168.1.2) from router 2(10.0.0.9) will fail.
How should i influence the route such router 2 will choose 10.0.0.14 as the next hop for 192.168.1.0/24 such that peering can between router 2(10.0.0.9) and Nexus 1(192.168.1.2) can be successful
Thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-20-2012 01:04 AM
you are trying to setup a full iBGP mesh i suppose?
Normally you would run a IGP like OSPF or EIGRP to get all the internal routes propagated and then you should be able to create the iBGP neighbours.
09-13-2012 06:32 PM
Hi all,
I am thinking that I should do as-path pretend to influence the routing, right?
Any idea why 192.169.1.2 only has 1 as-path(64982) while 10.0.0.14 has 2 as-path pretended even though it 10.0.0.14 is 1 h away while 192.168.1.2 is 2 hops away.
Thanks.
09-20-2012 01:04 AM
you are trying to setup a full iBGP mesh i suppose?
Normally you would run a IGP like OSPF or EIGRP to get all the internal routes propagated and then you should be able to create the iBGP neighbours.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide