04-26-2024 04:33 AM
i want to know what's the difference between 2-tier and 3-tier LAN architectures?
04-26-2024 04:38 AM - edited 04-29-2024 02:34 AM
!
MHM
04-26-2024 04:55 AM
As @MHM Cisco World reply shows, 3 tier has a core, distribution and edge layers/tiers. A 2 tier combines the core and distribution layers providing core/distribution and edge layers/tiers. The latter is also know as a "collapsed core".
04-29-2024 01:07 AM
In a 2-tier LAN architecture, there are two main layers: the access layer and the core layer. 3-tier architectures generally offer better scalability due to the distribution layer, allowing for more flexibility in managing and expanding the network. Today, modern architecture on DC use spine and leaf architecture instead of traditional 3-Tier.
04-29-2024 07:45 AM
"Today, modern architecture on DC use spine and leaf architecture instead of traditional 3-Tier."
True, but likely only seen in larger/largest DCs.
Conversely, on the smaller DC end, you might only see (logically) 1 tier using a pair of Nexus, using vPC and FEXs. Such can host a not inconsequential number of hosts.
"3-tier architectures generally offer better scalability due to the distribution layer, allowing for more flexibility in managing and expanding the network."
Also true, but personally I believe a classic 3 tier model owes its preeminence to it handles so much well, i.e. you won't go "wrong" using it. However, the 3 tier model has so much "clout" often I've seen it difficult to propose other architectures because "it's not 3 tier". For example reluctance to use a spine/leaf DC architecture, when it would be a better option.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide