03-25-2005 09:59 PM - edited 03-02-2019 10:16 PM
We have ATM Backbone network.
End user accessing with ELANE and Ethernet.
ATM is very many troubleshootings.
what's the ATM ELANE of good point ?
and what's the LECS for ATM ?
Thanks......
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-26-2005 06:19 AM
ATM is a connection-oriented technology - think: "Build a pipe from host A to host B, use it, then tear it down when you're done"
Ethernet is broadcast-oriented - think:"scream real loud, if the other station hears it, it will respond.
"
In order to emulate Ethernet on ATM (LANE: LAN-Emulation) you need some way to convert an Ethernet broadcast into a bunch of separate "pipes" to each station on that emulated LAN.
The system to accomplish that is the LECS, LES, BUS.
LECS - LAN Emulation Configuration Server
LES - LAN Emulation Server
BUS - Broadcast Unknown Server
The LECS sits (usually) on a well-known address. When a host first starts up, it looks to that well-known address and tells it " I belong to this ELAN (Emulated LAN)." The LECS responds by telling the host the address of it's LES and BUS (frequently the same machine/device).
The host then registers with that LES/BUS. All hosts for that ELAN register to that LES/BUS.
When a host, emulating Ethernet, needs to send traffic to another host/device, it gets the destination address from the LES (then uses the system to build a "pipe" (Virtual Circuit) to the destination.
In situations where Ethernet would usually broadcast (like an ARP), the LES/BUS will forward the broadcast on a a group of VCs to each host it knows about. If the desired host hears the request, it responds. If the host is off-ELAN, then (more or less) normal routing protocol-like processes propagate the request to other ELANs, LANs, or segments.
For a couple years, ATM was a hot backbone technology. It WAS the best you could get.
LANE and ELANs were a mechanism to allow a graceful transition from traditional Ethernet (or Token-Ring) to a native ATM environment.
Before ATM could really capture the market, Gig Ethernet hit the street and gained popularity ... passing ATM as a first-choice.
ATM is still widely used in carrier networks, because of it's desirable propagation characteristics.
The LECS exists to tell hosts what it's LES/BUS addresses are. You could configure an ATM LANE network without a LECS, but you'd have to manually configure each host with a specific LES/BUS address.
Hope this helps ... It's just a "scratch the surface" description .. to go deeper would require MUCH more space than provided.
Here's a link that may be helpful: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1921.htm
Good Luck
Scott
03-26-2005 06:19 AM
ATM is a connection-oriented technology - think: "Build a pipe from host A to host B, use it, then tear it down when you're done"
Ethernet is broadcast-oriented - think:"scream real loud, if the other station hears it, it will respond.
"
In order to emulate Ethernet on ATM (LANE: LAN-Emulation) you need some way to convert an Ethernet broadcast into a bunch of separate "pipes" to each station on that emulated LAN.
The system to accomplish that is the LECS, LES, BUS.
LECS - LAN Emulation Configuration Server
LES - LAN Emulation Server
BUS - Broadcast Unknown Server
The LECS sits (usually) on a well-known address. When a host first starts up, it looks to that well-known address and tells it " I belong to this ELAN (Emulated LAN)." The LECS responds by telling the host the address of it's LES and BUS (frequently the same machine/device).
The host then registers with that LES/BUS. All hosts for that ELAN register to that LES/BUS.
When a host, emulating Ethernet, needs to send traffic to another host/device, it gets the destination address from the LES (then uses the system to build a "pipe" (Virtual Circuit) to the destination.
In situations where Ethernet would usually broadcast (like an ARP), the LES/BUS will forward the broadcast on a a group of VCs to each host it knows about. If the desired host hears the request, it responds. If the host is off-ELAN, then (more or less) normal routing protocol-like processes propagate the request to other ELANs, LANs, or segments.
For a couple years, ATM was a hot backbone technology. It WAS the best you could get.
LANE and ELANs were a mechanism to allow a graceful transition from traditional Ethernet (or Token-Ring) to a native ATM environment.
Before ATM could really capture the market, Gig Ethernet hit the street and gained popularity ... passing ATM as a first-choice.
ATM is still widely used in carrier networks, because of it's desirable propagation characteristics.
The LECS exists to tell hosts what it's LES/BUS addresses are. You could configure an ATM LANE network without a LECS, but you'd have to manually configure each host with a specific LES/BUS address.
Hope this helps ... It's just a "scratch the surface" description .. to go deeper would require MUCH more space than provided.
Here's a link that may be helpful: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1921.htm
Good Luck
Scott
03-26-2005 08:07 AM
Hi...
Thank you for your detail description.
But ATM ELANE is still not understanding.
I'm agree that "passing ATM as a first-choice."
South Korea of Backbone network is most of Giga Ethernet with DWDM.
Good Luck and have a nice day.
"Dok-do is Korea Island" Not Japan Island.
03-29-2005 03:45 AM
ELAN (Emulated LAN) is the LANE Emulation Client (LEC) and all of the LANE services (LECS, LES, and BUS as ScottMac described) work together to emulate an Ethernet LAN.
The LEC is the interface between the ATM end station and the LANE services. If utilized on an ATM capable switch a VLAN to ELAN mapping needs to be configured in order for the VLAN to operate transparently over ATM.
HTH
Ryan
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide