I have two routers in a central site with a frame-relay PVC each to the remote sites. I send to the remote sites a default summary-address in each PVC to the remote site of each central router.
ip summary-address eigrp 10 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 5
in one central router I have configured delay 2100 (because I want than the remote site prefers the route received from the other router)
But when I show the ip routes in the remote site I see the default route sended by de router configured with de delay and I expected the other one. I run a show ip eigrp topology 0.0.0.0 and I see that the delay for the default route sended by the router configured without delay is 25000 (it should be 20000) and the second is 21000 as I expected (as it is configured).
I return to the central site and I run a show ip eigrp topology 0.0.0.0 in both routers. The router without the delay configured has a delay in the default route of 5000 (the the remote site receives de default route with de delay 20000+5000=25000 as I have mentioned) and the router with de delay of 2100
when I run show ip eigrp topology 0.0.0.0 has a delay of 0 then the remote site for the default route received from this second router has a delay of (21000+0) and it prefers this route
My question is: Why in the summary default route to null0 in the central routers the calculation of the delay is different?