12-29-2004 10:11 PM - edited 03-02-2019 08:49 PM
Hi
I have a router (Rtr-A) connected to an ATM link. I also have the following connections to Rtr-A:
Rtr-B (level-1 router) on S0/0.100
Rtr-C (level-1 and 2 router) on S0/0.110
The routes I'm summarizing are 196.5.128-131.0/24 into a single route of 196.5.128.0/22 using the level-1-2 option
When I look at the routing tables on Rtr-B, I still see all 4 subnet (/24 mask) but on Rtr-C I'm seeing the summarized routes and the 4 subnets.
Is there any way to only see the summarization through simply using the summary command or will I have to utilize route maps?
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-29-2004 10:35 PM
Hello,
AFAIK, ISIS route summarization can only occur between areas and between levels. Is your Router B a level 1 router and in the same area as your Router A ? That would explain why you do not see the summary route at all on Router B. Check the same on Router C, it could be that you see the summary route as a level 2 route, and the 4 subnets as level 1 routes...
Just a thought.
Regards,
GP
12-30-2004 07:35 PM
First, I would like to start by saying, hwat a scenario!! Only in the CCIE lab you'll see something like this (hopefully) ;o)
Rtr-B sees the 4 /24 prefixes via the level-1 LSP.
Rtr-C also sees the 4 /24 prefixes via the level-1 LSP and the /22 via the level-2 LSP coming from Rtr-A.
In this scenario, the only way you could see only the summary on Rtr-B and C is to redistribute these 4 subnets into isis instead of configuring isis on the interface(s) where these addresses are configured and do the summarization as you redistribute into isis.
I suppose Rtr-A is the one originating these prefixes. Right?
Hope this helps,
12-29-2004 10:35 PM
Hello,
AFAIK, ISIS route summarization can only occur between areas and between levels. Is your Router B a level 1 router and in the same area as your Router A ? That would explain why you do not see the summary route at all on Router B. Check the same on Router C, it could be that you see the summary route as a level 2 route, and the 4 subnets as level 1 routes...
Just a thought.
Regards,
GP
12-29-2004 10:43 PM
Hi
Rtr-A & C are level-1 & 2 routers. Rtr-B is only level 1. I have not restricted the link between A & C to a particular level. I'm seeing the summarization as L2. All three routers are also in the same area.
I'm studying for my CCIE lab exam so would it be possible to email me directly at ernst.pelser@infosecureltd.com
Thanks
12-30-2004 07:35 PM
First, I would like to start by saying, hwat a scenario!! Only in the CCIE lab you'll see something like this (hopefully) ;o)
Rtr-B sees the 4 /24 prefixes via the level-1 LSP.
Rtr-C also sees the 4 /24 prefixes via the level-1 LSP and the /22 via the level-2 LSP coming from Rtr-A.
In this scenario, the only way you could see only the summary on Rtr-B and C is to redistribute these 4 subnets into isis instead of configuring isis on the interface(s) where these addresses are configured and do the summarization as you redistribute into isis.
I suppose Rtr-A is the one originating these prefixes. Right?
Hope this helps,
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide