12-22-2002 12:53 AM - edited 03-02-2019 03:46 AM
i have an OSPF network with 3 normal areas and of course a backbone area( area 0)
and one router that resides in area (2) is connected by two links to two ABR routers that connects area (2) to area (0).
i tried to draw a diagram for the topology , R1 is connected to Internet and the Ethernet is in area(0), R2 and R3 are ABRs.
R4 is a remote site and having two links (T1)links to the each for ABR.
also R5 is a remote site and is connected to one of the ABRs by T1.and Link 3 is in area (2) also
note: tha ABRs are on ethernet segment.
when link 2 is not connected, traffic from internet destined to R4 is through link 2 traffic from internet destined toR5 is throught Link3
when i connect link 2 i thought that traffic destined for R4 will be load shared on link1 and link 2 , but this doesn't happen.
what happends is that all traffic destined for R4 comes throught link1 only. and traffic destined to R5 comes throught link1 then link 2 ..and doesn't go throught link 3 at all
can anyone help me in this problem., knowing that link cost are known..
Thanks
Mhaddad
R1
____________|___Ethernet_____________
| |
| |
R2 R3.
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
Link 1 , , Link 2 , Link 3
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
R4 R5
12-22-2002 01:58 PM
Are R4 and R5 interconnected on the Ethernetside?
I assumed that they are not.
Looks like you have a static route connected to link1 that takes precedence over the rest. More info will be nescearry though.
Can you upload a sh ip route from R2 and from R4?
12-22-2002 11:39 PM
no ..R4 and R5 are not connected to the ethernet..
and i am not having static routes.., the problem is that i tried to draw a shematic diagram..but when i posted my message..it changed..
so if i can send u the diagram by any other mean..this will make the vision clear for you...if i can send it by mail ..u will see the toplogy well.
and the sho ip route will be too long..
12-23-2002 04:06 AM
It is hard to diagnose with the information given . Do not forget that in OSPF will prefer in interarea router over in interarea route even if the interarea route has a cheaper cost .
07-24-2018 03:26 AM
can we have two ABRs in the network?
Yes, we can have. Having one ABR is like a single point of failure. So, it's better to have two ABRs for redundancy purpose. But, we need to use in a proper way other wise suboptimal routing may happen.
Refer the below link for better understanding:
https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/ospf-problem-with-two-abr/td-p/2086740
07-24-2018 03:29 AM
can we have two ABRs in the network?
Yes, we can have. Having one ABR is like a single point of failure. So, it's better to have two ABR for redundancy purpose. But, we need to use in a proper way otherwise sub-optimal routing may happen.
Refer the below link for better understanding:
https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/ospf-problem-with-two-abr/td-p/2086740
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide