12-11-2002 09:22 AM - edited 03-02-2019 03:31 AM
I have a situation where routes are learned by BGP on a router1, router1
redistributes them into eigrp (as distance 170 external ), and sends them to router 2 via eigrp 170.
router2 redistributes those same routes into rip (i know it's a mess), and router 2 sends them rip to router 3 via router2's interface 1, router 3 sends them back to router2 via rip on router2's interface 2, and now router2 is getting a route to the subnet via router3 (120), which it prefers over the 170 which it originally got from router1. (Classic routing loop)
I know how to work around this with access lists , (we actually worked around it with static routes from router1 to the subnets, which it redistributes as 90's into EIGRP ), but my only question is:
Isn't there a way to tell router 2 to treat the 170's that it's receiving from router 1 as 90's, or to tell router 1 to redistribute from BGP into EIGRP, and send the
redistributed eigrp update's out as 90's?
(Static routes are preventing us from doing link backup).
Thanks !
12-11-2002 09:47 AM
Looks like you can benefit from distance:
For EIGRP process: distance eigrp 90 90
Will result in uniform AD for all routes.
Thanks.
12-11-2002 09:56 AM
That sounds like the solution.
One question, Is distance only on the receiving end, or will the router
that has the distance 90 90 command configured, also send those 170's
that it received and now converted to 90's internally , out to it's other neighbors as 90's?
12-11-2002 10:02 AM
No it will only have local significance.
12-11-2002 10:03 AM
Thanks very much. This has been very helpful.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide