08-06-2003 10:27 AM - edited 03-02-2019 09:24 AM
Is there a problem with a Cisco router accepting a multicast MAC in response to a unicast ARP request? Does a switch have a similar problem such that it won't put a multicast MAC in its cam table? A Check Point HA solution using multicast MACS allegedly requires static cam entries and arp entries all over the place and I'm trying to see if this can be avoided.
08-06-2003 02:17 PM
You probably want to look at VRRP on the CheckPoint stuff, I seem to remember the CatX's will have issues with Multicast MAC entries (flooding??)
08-06-2003 03:25 PM
Probably depends on the solution that is being used, a stonebeat or clusterxl setup will require multicast mac addresses to work properly, but if you're using nokia's or can buy some radware boxes then you won't need them.
Here is Stonebeats document for routers:
http://www.stonesoft.com/estone/support/knowledgebase/view.html?id=0000000647&q=cisco
and a link to some example switch setups for it:
http://www.stonesoft.com/document/art/2368.html
(ClusterXL should be a long the same lines as these).
Cheers,
Steve
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide