About andrew.butterworth

andrew.butterworth · 06-20-2025

We are in the process of deploying some multi-instance FPR3130 pairs. The FPR3130's were supplied with 7.2.8-25 so we manually upgraded them to 7.4.2-172 and then onboarded them into the FMCv where we then converted them to multi-instance. We then ...

andrew.butterworth · 06-09-2025

I have a couple of C8300 routers providing Internet connectivity. They have been onboarded into CCC and I have enabled CBAR on both of them via CCC with the WAN interfaces defined. I can see the standard Advanced Profile Pack, plus the CCC provided...

andrew.butterworth · 06-05-2025

I've read the documentation on how to enable SNMP for the chassis as opposed to each instance and it looks incredibly simple. I've told it to use the SNMP settings for one of the instances. On our NMS platform I have discovered all the instances OK...

andrew.butterworth · 06-03-2025

I've got a freshly built FMCv running 7.4.2.2 (build 28). It has two vNICs, one connected to a dedicated management network (eth0) and one in the environment its managing (eth1). The default route is via eth1 with the next-hop a firewall I have con...

andrew.butterworth · 04-03-2025

When FMC/FTD 7.7 appeared, I quickly upgraded one of the lab FMC's and a couple of vFTD's. A day or so later FMC 7.7.0-89 was pulled and replaced with 7.7.0-91 with a note saying: As this is in the lab, I don't have support so a TAC case isn't goin...

andrew.butterworth · 07-01-2025

Yes, if it was FPR4100/9300 series. The FPR3100 series doesn't have separate FXOS & FTD upgrades, its a combined package that contains firmware, FXOS and the FTD image. Based on Marvin's reply and the link he posted, Threat Defence 7.4.2.2 and 7.4....

andrew.butterworth · 06-30-2025

So, I'm guessing that the firmware (1.4.102) and FXOS version (2.14(1.187)) in 7.4.2.2 and 7.4.2.3 are the same so there isn't an upgrade to perform for the chassis. The FTD instances each upgraded OK to the new version.

andrew.butterworth · 06-05-2025

I think the Health Event was 'frozen'. As I say I think it was a timing thing. When it was originally built, it wasn't licensed as it didn't have any Internet connectivity so reported the Heath errors. After it got Internet connectivity and was li...

andrew.butterworth · 06-03-2025

I think it might be a timing and licensing thing.... When it was initially built, it wasn't licensed. Once we added the 2nd vNIC and sorted the Internet access out, we smart licensed it and added the FTD's its going to manage. I think at this poin...

andrew.butterworth · 06-03-2025

I'm wondering whether this is an issue because its the eth1 interface rather than the eth0. The documentation talks about the FMC establishing communication to the managed devices initially via the eth0 interface, but will try others if it doesn't es...

Member Since	‎06-20-2002 01:22 AM
Date Last Visited	‎07-01-2025 10:04 AM
Posts	1,531
Total Helpful Votes Received	964

User Statistics

User Activity

FMC 7.4 and multi-instance FPR3130 chassis upgrades

Catalyst Center & Application Visibility with C8300 router

FPR3130 multi-instance and chassis SNMP

FMC security intelligence feeds failure - says DNS issue, but it isn't

FMC 7.7 - 7.7.0-89 & 7.7.0-91?

Re: FMC 7.4 and multi-instance FPR3130 chassis upgrades

Re: FMC 7.4 and multi-instance FPR3130 chassis upgrades

Re: FMC security intelligence feeds failure - says DNS issue, but it i

Re: FMC security intelligence feeds failure - says DNS issue, but it i

Re: FMC security intelligence feeds failure - says DNS issue, but it i