11-17-2007 04:05 AM - edited 03-09-2019 07:25 PM
Hi!
I need to set up a redundance solution where one ISP uses PPPoE and one static ip adresses. And over there I though of running to tunnels, where I either load balanced or used failover.
But the real problem is that everything needs to go through the tunnel.
Is it possible to do:
int fa0/0
ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
int tunnel0
ip add 1.2.1.1 255.255.255.0
tunnel source fa0/0
tunnel dest 1.3.1.1
tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
tunnel protection ipsec VTI
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tunnel0
11-22-2007 10:36 AM
My suggestion is to have ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.2 after ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tunnel0. Because always routing is checked from top to bottom . If a match ( First route entry ) is found that interface or ip address is chosen.
11-22-2007 11:15 PM
Hi thanks for the reply :)
I justed tried to set a default route through a tunnel in a lab.
The tunnel came up, but when it found out that there was an overlapping route it whent down again. So the conclusion is that you can not use a default route through a virtual interface tunnel.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide