12-20-2007 02:58 AM - edited 03-09-2019 07:41 PM
My PIX firewall is VPN headend device. It is located behind C1721 router. I have to customize VPN remote access without splitting tunnel network. It is work OK if I try to connect from VPN client located between PIX and C1721. If I try to connect from external VPN client located before C1721 then it work without access to internal resources. But it work OK if I use possibility of splitting tunnel network. I switched on possibility of Reverse Route Injection. Help to localize a mistake, please. What is wrong?
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-25-2007 03:15 PM
If you are talking about accessing the Internal LAN behind PIX from the clients, there's no way it will NOT work without split tunnel, if it works with split tunnel.
Could you please paste a n/w diagram and relevant part of PIX and router config.
12-24-2007 02:24 AM
Hi Andrey
Make sure following exists in firewall config
crrypto isakmp nat-traversal 20
Regards
12-24-2007 11:42 AM
It exist in my config.
External client can not access to internal resources if I include for group policy the following attributes:
"split-tunnel-policy tunnelall"
"split-tunnel-network-list none".
I should specify - external client receive access to Internet through VPN connection.
12-25-2007 03:15 PM
If you are talking about accessing the Internal LAN behind PIX from the clients, there's no way it will NOT work without split tunnel, if it works with split tunnel.
Could you please paste a n/w diagram and relevant part of PIX and router config.
12-26-2007 12:29 AM
Please, see PDF-files in attachment.
You will find network diagram and configuration files for Cisco's devices.
12-28-2007 07:15 AM
Thanks for all. I found the mistake in configuration of C1721.
It was wrong destination port for IPSec over UDP.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide