04-21-2013 09:23 PM
I have been banging at this now for two days and just cannot get Inter-VLAN routing working to work on this router.
Here is the est-up:.
Upgraded to latest Cisco firmware (1.0.1.9).
Starting with factory default settings, I added 2 VLANS as follows:
vlan default(id=1): dhcpmode=server IP=192.168.1.1/24 port 1
vlan vlan2 (id=2): dhcpmode=server IP=192.168.2.1/24 port 2
vlan vlan3 (id=3): dhcpmode=server IP=192.168.3.1/24 port 3
(unconnected)
WAN port
|
Routing/NAT
|
--------------------------------------
vlan ip 192.168.1.1 192.168.2.1 192.168.3.1
vlan name default vlan2 vlan3
vlan id ID=1 ID=2 ID=3
Inter-VLAN Routing No Yes Yes
Port 1 Untagged Excluded Excluded
Port 2 Excluded Untagged Excluded
Port 3 Excluded Excluded Untagged
Port 4(not of interest) Untagged Excluded Excluded
--------- -------- --------
Port 1 Port 2 Port 3
| | |
AdminPC PC2 PC3
192.168.2.191 192.168.3.181
PC2 gets assigned an IP Address of 192.168.2.191 (DGW=192.168.2.1) - OK
PC3 gets assigned an IP Address of 192.168.3.181 (DGW=192.168.3.1) - OK
PC2 with (IP 192.168.2.191) can ping 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1 - OK
PC3 with (IP 192.168.3.181) can ping 192.168.3.1 and 192.168.2.1 - OK
BUT....
PC2 cannot ping PC3 - NOT WORKING
PC3 cannot ping PC2 - NOT WORKING
(does not work in both Gateway Mode and Router Mode)
ANYONE CAN HELP ME FIGURE OUT WHY ??????
Your help is much appreciated.
I bought this device specifically because it supported inter-VLAN routing!.
Venu
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supporting Information:
Screen captures:
VLAN Membership:
VLAN ID Description Inter VLAN Device Port 1 Port 2 Port 3 Port 4
Routing Mgment
1 Default Disabled Enabled Untagged Excluded Excluded Untagged
2 VLAN2 Enabled Enabled Excluded Untagged Excluded Excluded
3 VLAN3 Enabled Enabled Excluded Excluded Untagged Excluded
Multiple VLAN Subnets:
VLAN ID IP Address Subnet Mask DHCP Mode DNS Proxy Status
1 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 DHCP Server Enabled
2 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 DHCP Server Enabled
3 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 DHCP Server Enabled
Routing Table (Gateway Mode)
Destination Gateway Genmask Metric Ref Use Interface Type Flags
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 1 0 0 lo Static UP,Gateway,Host
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0 0 bdg3 Dynamic UP
192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0 0 bdg2 Dynamic UP
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0 0 bdg1 Static UP
192.168.1.0 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 1 0 0 bdg1 Static UP,Gateway
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 0 0 0 lo Dynamic
Routing Table (Router Mode)
(Same)
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-22-2013 08:00 AM
Hi,
It's not because the pings are permitted on the same subnet that they are from a different subnet.
You surely have a windows software firewall issue because by default it drops the icmp echoes from a different subnet.
Regards
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
04-21-2013 09:50 PM
Hi Veno;
what about PC2 and PC3 ....any firewall or anything blocking icmp replies ?
04-22-2013 12:05 AM
No, nothing blocking ICMP replies on PC2 an PC3.. they respond to pings from the same subnet.
04-22-2013 03:05 AM
The RV180's firewall features include most of what you'd expect. It offers simple check boxes to permit or deny flooding attacks on both the WAN and LAN, as well controlling responses to ICMP messages.
04-22-2013 06:40 AM
OK :-) but what does that have to do with Inter-VLAN routing not working? As far as I know, the firewall is between the LAN and the WAN - and I am not using the WAN at all here. Do you think I need to add firewall rules for inter-VLAN traffic? The only rules I can set on the firewall seems to be LAN-to-WAN and WAN-to-LAN, not Inter-VLAN.
04-22-2013 08:00 AM
Hi,
It's not because the pings are permitted on the same subnet that they are from a different subnet.
You surely have a windows software firewall issue because by default it drops the icmp echoes from a different subnet.
Regards
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
04-22-2013 09:11 AM
Let me check it out and I will post my results...
04-22-2013 12:57 PM
cadet alain, you hit the nail on the head. The router was doing Iner-VLAN routing, but the PCs were blocking the pings because they came from another subnet. Thank you for your help in resolving this.
I have a follow-up question if I may - I need to add a default route but can't seem to find a way to do that. Tried adding a static route with IP=0.0.0.0 Mask=0.0.0.0 but it will not allow it. My current routing table looks like this:
Destination Gateway Genmask Metric Ref Use Interface Type Flags
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 1 0 0 lo Static UP,Gateway,Host
192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0 0 bdg2 Dynamic UP
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0 0 bdg1 Static UP
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 0 0 0 lo Dynamic UP
It routes all packets to VLAN2 and VLAN3 correctly; but if a packet arrives to any other network address, I would like to get it to forward to another gateway on VLAN2 (at address 192.168.2.254). Can't seem to find a way to add a default route.
04-22-2013 02:54 PM
My own reply to my last question re:default route.
It looks like one can have a default route (0.0.0.0/0) only to the WAN interface.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide