RV340 1:1 (one-to-one) NAT no longer available for IPSEC VPNs for overlapping subnets

[MichaelHicks83895]

Please, if I'm missing something, someone let me know.  I've looked everywhere, but the 1:1 NAT seems to be removed from the RV340.

I have 2 locations that need a VPN and both are using 192.168.1.0/24 for the LAN subnets.  Normally I'd set up some translation and life is good, but the option no longer seems to be available.  This is a potential non-starter for this series before I go back to SonicWall (ick) or PepLink (slow).  Does anyone have any suggestions on how to configure overlapping subnets across IPSec?

[Martin Aleksandrov]

Hello Michael,

1:1 NAT is basically now Static NAT on RV34x series (Firewall-->Static NAT). Using the site-to-site VPN the private LAN IP network address of each site should have no overlaps.

Regards,

Martin

[MichaelHicks83895]

Unfortunately, sometimes they do have overlaps.  Are you saying there is no way to configure this if both LANs are 192.168.1.x/24 ?  I would usually use 1:1 to work around the problem.

[carlosvanderkuijl]

this is a old post, but is there any possibilities to do some "NAT Source" configuration on a RV340 if two sites got the same address range? because i can't find any anwsers regarding question from MichaelHicks83895, please let us now