cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
837
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

2547oDMVPN vs LISPoDMVPN

anazarenko
Level 1
Level 1

Which technology would you implement if multi-tenancy is required over consolidated WAN cloud:

LISPoDMVPN or 2547oDMVPN?

There're some rumours that 2547oDMVPN can be officially supported with IWAN 2.2 in the near future.

LISPoDMVPN looks a little bit more complex than 2547oDMVPN.

2 Replies 2

Philip D'Ath
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

2547oDMVPN is a more "tried and true" technology.  It has a lot of maturity behind it.  It will probably be easier to integrate into other MPLS layers.  It will probably work with a wide range of devices.  It is likely to have less bugs as well.  You are likely to find more management tools for this style of solution.

As a result I think it is probably a lower risk option.

LISPoDMVPN will only work on modern kit.  It is certainly a lot newer.  It does offer a lot of powerful features, like host mobility.  I consider it a higher risk option, and I would probably only want to use it in a constrained environment were interoperability of all components could be tested and validated in advance.

Dear Philip,

I strongly agree with you. After some prototyping in the LAB, the MPLS VPN over DMVPN worked much better than LISP.