Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello Community, Maybe somebody can shed some light about these obsolete Firepower units. We have removed them from production because according to cisco announcement the last security update will be delivered only until the end of Aug 2025.But I am ...
Hi, Unfortunately I can't easily find any manuals how to use ACI in open mode without inter-EPG contracts.Is it a valid mode? Where can I find any manuals about it?
Hi, i am trying to: backup the full config of FMCuntar the backupgunzip the table structure filemodify the filegzip ittar the backupupload back to FMC. And the file appears in "Firepower management backup" list.Does it mean that there's no integrity ...
Dear All, Does anybody know if admin context, configured in routed mode but with transparent user contexts, with access to a dedicated physical management port can send syslog messages for other contexts as well?The problem is I can't use inband sysl...
Dear All,
I have more than 8 private transports in HQ and I've read I can't run them with Viptela. There're lots of p2p l2 circuits and it seems i need to aggregate them first and present them as one transport service to Viptela.
Maybe somebody had...
Hi Rob,Here's the announcement for our model:https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/firepower-ngfw/eos-eol-notice-c51-743522.htmlYour link is for more recent FWs. Cheers,Oleksandr
Hi unfortunately i managed to deploy the tampered backup file to FMC without single error.I have changed the varchar size for uuid field in my backup and I can see it now in FMC mysql: mysql> desc firewall_policies;+-------------------------+-------...
Can somebody from Cisco elaborate from transparent context is lacking shared management-only interface support? Many people have security requirements to use OOB network for syslog/tacacs protocols.
I have a requirement to validate all HA upgrades in the LAB. I don't think FTDv is a right representation in this case. As you mentioned I can't validate underneath FXOS upgrades with FTDv. Traffic wise 5Mbps throughtput will be more than enough.
