I have a pair of mpls routers running BGP and redistributing routes into EIGRP.
The redistribution is controlled via a route-map
The route-map has a match statement based on bgp community tags
router eigrp 1
default-metric 100000 100 255 1 1500
network 10.3.128.53 0.0.0.0
network 10.80.95.148 0.0.0.0
network 10.80.95.156 0.0.0.0
network 213.12.66.178 0.0.0.0
redistribute bgp 65139 route-map bgp->eigrp
route-map bgp->eigrp permit 5
match ip address prefix-list eem-leak-2
set metric 100
set tag 4445
!
route-map bgp->eigrp deny 10
match community cw-mgt-routes
!
route-map bgp->eigrp deny 20
match community local-eigrp-routes
!
route-map bgp->eigrp permit 30
match community cw-voice-subnets XXXXXX-voice-subnets
set metric 100000 50 255 1 1500
set tag 4445
!
route-map bgp->eigrp permit 40
set tag 4445
Named Community standard list cw-voice-subnets
permit 1:10
permit 1:20
Named Community expanded list XXXXXX-voice-subnets
permit _65139:1([0-9][1-9])_
My question is if the prefix being redistributed has a tag of 7100
sh ip bgp 10.232.250.0/24
BGP routing table entry for 10.232.250.0/24, version 8198
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
Not advertised to any peer
Refresh Epoch 1
4445 4445, (received & used)
10.3.242.245 from 10.3.242.245 (63.130.108.8)
Origin incomplete, localpref 100, valid, external, best
Community: 1:10 152:111 65139:7100
Extended Community: RT:4445:115 RT:4445:702000
rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0x0
Should this not be redistributed with the default metric defined under the EIGRP process or should the permit 40 entry of the route-map have the default metric defined.
