05-31-2005 05:34 AM - edited 03-03-2019 09:42 AM
What would be the best QOS method to use in the following situation, and where to place the policy - i.e. hub, spoke or both:
Main site = DS3 (ATM)
Remote sites = T1 (frame relay)
Need to ensure that client (remote) sessions with server (main site) get priority. I may have to priorities other traffic as well in the future.
05-31-2005 06:05 AM
I classify in both directions. Here is an example protecting 60% of the bandwidth for Microsoft RDP traffic, alloting 10% to telnet traffic, and 5% at less than best effort to printer traffic:
class-map match-any SILVER-IN
match access-group name SILVER-IN
class-map match-any LTBE-IN
match access-group name LTBE-IN
class-map match-any GOLD-IN
match access-group name GOLD-IN
class-map match-any LTBE
description Desktop Printing data
match access-group name LTBE
match ip dscp 6
class-map match-any SILVER
match access-group name SILVER
match ip dscp af11
class-map match-any GOLD
description RDP Traffic
match access-group name GOLD
match ip dscp af21
!
!
policy-map WAN-EDGE-IN
class LTBE-IN
set ip dscp 6
class GOLD-IN
set ip dscp af21
class SILVER-IN
set ip dscp af11
class class-default
set ip dscp default
policy-map WAN-EDGE
class GOLD
bandwidth percent 60
class SILVER
bandwidth percent 10
class LTBE
bandwidth percent 5
class class-default
fair-queue
interface FastEthernet0/1
service-policy input WAN-EDGE-IN
!
interface ATM2/0.10 point-to-point
pvc my_pvc 1/10
vbr-nrt 384 270 36
service-policy output WAN-EDGE
ip access-list extended GOLD-DATA
permit tcp any eq 3389 any
permit tcp any any eq 3389
ip access-list extended GOLD-DATA-IN
permit tcp any eq 3389 any
permit tcp any any eq 3389
permit udp any eq 3389 any
permit udp any any eq 3389
ip access-list extended LESS-THEN-BE-DATA
permit tcp any eq 9100 any
permit tcp any any eq 9100
ip access-list extended LESS-THEN-BE-DATA-IN
permit tcp any eq 9100 any
permit tcp any any eq 9100
permit udp any eq 9100 any
permit udp any any eq 9100
ip access-list extended SILVER-DATA
permit tcp any eq telnet any
permit tcp any any eq telnet
ip access-list extended SILVER-DATA-IN
permit tcp any eq telnet any
permit tcp any any eq telnet
06-20-2005 09:45 AM
Thanks for the info -
Just one question. At the WAN edge router you apply the policy inbound to the ethernet inferface as opposed to outbound on the WAN interface. What is the advantage of doing this if any?
Thanks
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide