cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
701
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Basic PFR on a single router connected to Dual ISP with BGP.

sarabsin
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

 

I have implemented PfR for one of my customers .The configuration is basic .

The two external interfaces are gig 0/0 and gig 0/2 connected to 2 different ISPs.

Xmit utilization is 50 % on both the interfaces. How ever if i initiate uploads to google drive and microsoft 's onedrive. The traffic for both flows through only one link gig 0/0 even though it reaches 80% , PfR does not move one of the traffic to gig 0/2. The rate of gig 0/2 is 0 bits/secs.

I see following in the logs:

CST: %OER_MC-5-NOTICE: Passive Unreachable OOP Prefix 38.113.165.86/32, No Egress  bw for 2.2.2.2, intf Gi0/0
Jun 20 17:40:15 CST: %PFR_MC-5-OOP_LINK: Load balance is out of policy.BR 2.2.2.2 i/f Gi0/0 currently at %55 bandwidth utilization, BR 2.2.2.2 i/f Gi0/2 

currently at %0 bandwidth utilization
Jun 20 17:40:15 CST: %PFR_MC-5-OOP_LINK: The current bandwidth utilization of BR 2.2.2.2 intf Gi0/0 is out of policy; Bandwidth untilization 55340, 

configured threshold 50000
Jun 20 17:40:15 CST: %PFR_MC-5-OOP_LINK: The load of 2.2.2.2 intf Gi0/0 is out of policy. Transmit bandwith 55340, Receive bandwidth 2615,Transmit load 

55, Receive Load 2
Jun 20 17:40:29 CST: %OER_MC-5-NOTICE: Passive Unreachable OOP Prefix 62.128.100.217/32, No Egress  bw for 2.2.2.2, intf Gi0/0
Jun 20 17:41:04 CST: %OER_MC-5-NOTICE: Passive Unreachable OOP Prefix 98.192.103.111/32, No Egress  bw for 2.2.2.2, intf Gi0/0
Jun 20 17:41:15 CST: %PFR_MC-5-OOP_LINK: Load balance is out of policy.BR 2.2.2.2 i/f Gi0/0 currently at %55 bandwidth utilization, BR 2.2.2.2 i/f Gi0/2 

currently at %0 bandwidth utilization
Jun 20 17:41:15 CST: %PFR_MC-5-OOP_LINK: The current bandwidth utilization of BR 2.2.2.2 intf Gi0/0 is out of policy; Bandwidth untilization 55862, 

configured threshold 50000
Jun 20 17:41:15 CST: %PFR_MC-5-OOP_LINK: The load of 2.2.2.2 intf Gi0/0 is out of policy. Transmit bandwith 55862, Receive bandwidth 2460,Transmit load 

55, Receive Load 2
Jun 20 17:41:23 CST: %OER_MC-5-NOTICE: Passive Unreachable OOP Prefix 73.153.135.0/24, No Egress  bw for 2.2.2.2, intf Gi0/0
Jun 20 17:41:27 CST: %OER_MC-5-NOTICE: Passive Unreachable OOP Prefix 184.0.50.34/32, No Egress  bw for 2.2.2.2, intf Gi0/0
Jun 20 17:41:42 CST: %PFR_MC-6-OOP_PASSIVE_MODE: Relative short term unreachable measurement is out of policy.Prefix 98.200.38.90/32, unreachable 171428, 

BR 2.2.2.2, i/f Gi0/0, relative change 71, prev BR 2.2.2.2 i/f Gi0/0
Jun 20 17:42:09 CST: %OER_MC-5-NOTICE: Passive Unreachable OOP Prefix 98.249.35.103/32, No Egress  bw for 2.2.2.2, intf Gi0/0
Jun 20 17:42:18 CST: %OER_MC-5-NOTICE: Passive Unreachable OOP Prefix 4.28.136.42/32, No Egress  bw for 2.2.2.2, intf Gi0/0

 

What does "Passive Unreachable OOP Prefix 98.249.35.103/32, No Egress  bw for 2.2.2.2, intf Gi0/0" mean?

 

 

 

 

1 Reply 1

Hi mate,

check this one out.

http://ieoc.com/forums/p/25287/197043.aspx

Your routing is most probably not complete.

Also, implementing the old OER most probably has no future. Check out the latest BRKRST-2362 session on Ciscolive365.com for PfRv3.

HTH

A.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card