cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1039
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax and IPv6

jni
Level 1
Level 1

Hello 

 

Quick question. 

 

I know bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax is working for IPv4, but what about IPv6 route loadbalancing?

 

I did lab it in GNS3, but it didn't give the expected output for IPv6. 

 

For IPv4 before/after implementation of bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax

#show ip bgp 0.0.0.0 
BGP routing tshow ip bgp 0.0.0.0 able entry for 0.0.0.0/0, version 21
Paths: (3 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Flag: 0x840
  Advertised to update-groups:
        1    2
  200, (received & used)
    200.200.200.1 from 200.200.200.1 (200.200.200.1)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external
  100, (received & used)
    100.100.100.1 from 100.100.100.1 (100.100.100.1)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best



#show ip bgp 0.0.0.0 
BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/0, version 30
Paths: (3 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Multipath: eBGP
  Advertised to update-groups:
        1    2
  200, (received & used)
    200.200.200.1 from 200.200.200.1 (200.200.200.1)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, multipath
  100, (received & used)
    100.100.100.1 from 100.100.100.1 (100.100.100.1)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, multipath, best

But if I try the same for IPv6 I see no difference in output before/after

#sh bgp ipv6 unicast ::/0
BGP routing table entry for ::/0, version 2
Paths: (3 available, best #2, table Global-IPv6-Table)
  Advertised to update-groups:
        1    2
  200
    2200::1 (FE80::C005:9DFF:FEAF:1) from 2200::1 (200.200.200.1)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external
  100
    1100::1 (FE80::C004:9DFF:FE90:1) from 1100::1 (100.100.100.1)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best



#sh bgp ipv6 unicast ::/0
BGP routing table entry for ::/0, version 2
Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Global-IPv6-Table)
  Advertised to update-groups:
        1	2
  200
    2200::1 (FE80::C005:9DFF:FEAF:1) from 2200::1 (200.200.200.1)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external
  100
    1100::1 (FE80::C004:9DFF:FE90:1) from 1100::1 (100.100.100.1)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best

Is this a GNS3 issue, doesn't it work for IPv6 or is it just me :o)

 

Thank you in advance.

 

 

 

 

2 Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions

Giuseppe Larosa
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hello @jni ,

can you post the configuration of your router , at least the router BGP section ?

Have you applied the command ar router bgp level or within an address family ?

ipv4 unicast

 

ipv6 unicast

 

It can also be a limitation of GNS3, but more info is needed to provide some help.

 

Hope to help

Giuseppe

 

View solution in original post

jni
Level 1
Level 1

Argh... my own fault

 

I forgot to add maximum-paths under the ipv6 address-family. This of course has to be added under each address-family. My bad.

View solution in original post

4 Replies 4

Giuseppe Larosa
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hello @jni ,

can you post the configuration of your router , at least the router BGP section ?

Have you applied the command ar router bgp level or within an address family ?

ipv4 unicast

 

ipv6 unicast

 

It can also be a limitation of GNS3, but more info is needed to provide some help.

 

Hope to help

Giuseppe

 

Since you where the only one to reply, and that you probably would have spottet the error when I posted the configuration, I accept your answer (but as I stated I didn't state maximum-paths under address-family ipv6)

Hello @jni ,

when dealing with MP BGP most of the commands become per address family,

So my suggestion was a guess of what could be the most reasonable cause of the issue based on experience.

 

I'm happy to have been of help

 

Best Regards

Giuseppe

 

jni
Level 1
Level 1

Argh... my own fault

 

I forgot to add maximum-paths under the ipv6 address-family. This of course has to be added under each address-family. My bad.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card