cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
295
Views
1
Helpful
3
Replies

BGP not sending hellos

grapevine
Level 1
Level 1

I am trying to form an EBGP adjaceny and they are not peering R6 and R8. Please advise

They are directly connected

Configuration below:

 

R6#sh run | s bgp
router bgp 3
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 9.9.9.9 remote-as 89
neighbor 9.9.9.9 update-source Loopback1
neighbor 9.9.9.9 soft-reconfiguration inbound
no auto-summary

R6#sh ip bgp summ
BGP router identifier 6.6.6.6, local AS number 3
BGP table version is 2, main routing table version 2
1 network entries using 132 bytes of memory
1 path entries using 52 bytes of memory
2/1 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 336 bytes of memory
0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
Bitfield cache entries: current 1 (at peak 1) using 32 bytes of memory
BGP using 552 total bytes of memory
BGP activity 1/0 prefixes, 1/0 paths, scan interval 60 secs

Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
9.9.9.9 4 89 0 0 0 0 0 never Idle

R6#ping 9.9.9.9

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 9.9.9.9, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/28/32 ms

 


R8#sh run | s bgp
router bgp 89
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 6.6.6.6 remote-as 3
neighbor 6.6.6.6 update-source Loopback1
neighbor 6.6.6.6 soft-reconfiguration inbound
no auto-summary

R8#sh ip bgp summ
BGP router identifier 9.9.9.9, local AS number 89
BGP table version is 3, main routing table version 3
2 network entries using 264 bytes of memory
2 path entries using 104 bytes of memory
2/1 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 336 bytes of memory
0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
BGP using 704 total bytes of memory
BGP activity 2/0 prefixes, 2/0 paths, scan interval 60 secs

Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
6.6.6.6 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 never Idle

R8#ping 6.6.6.6

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 6.6.6.6, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/27/32 ms

 

 

 

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Only you need this 

Neighbor x.x.x.x ebgp multihop 

You use LO not direct connect IP so ebgp is far than one ttl that why ebgp failed 

MHM

View solution in original post

3 Replies 3

Only you need this 

Neighbor x.x.x.x ebgp multihop 

You use LO not direct connect IP so ebgp is far than one ttl that why ebgp failed 

MHM

grapevine
Level 1
Level 1

Thanks for the quick response! That worked I was breaking my head for more than two hours.

Hello @grapevine 

FYI -
IBGP peering has a default TTL value of 255
EBGP peering has a default TTL value of 1

So when you try ebgp peering via loopback interfaces, those interfaces are not directly connected as such the TTL would become 2 the EBGP peering will not establish

Appending the multihop by itself , the ttl value will increase by default to 255 which is not really necessary, so you could just specify the multihop with a value, which means the ebgp peering can be up that hop value away

example
neighbour x.x.x. multihop 2

Additionally there is also BGP TTL neighbour security this is a bgp security feature that also states a TTL value but this value is absolute meaning the bgp peering have to be match otherwise the peering will not establish.

Note: TTL neighbour security/ Multihop are mutually exclusive to each other , so not to used at the same time


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul
Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card