07-20-2005 11:56 PM - edited 03-03-2019 10:05 AM
i have a C3640 (128/32) with c3640-jk9o3s-mz.123-15.bin with 2 FE.
It is configured to create 3 vlan in F0/0 and to connect to my ISP in F0/1.
I have configured 250 static nat (tcp/80).
When the traffic grows up to 1,5-2,0 Mb i notice a high cpu usage (80-90%) and a decrease of the performance.
i've tried differnts IOS image and i have played around the config: cef/no cef, acl/no acl, no subinterface, ecc..
Now i try to discover a robust/scalable solution in order to offer a good performance with 300 static nat (tcp/80) and a bandwith up to 20-25 Mb.
It's the PIX-525 what i looking for?
Maybe a 38xx.
thanks
davide
07-21-2005 02:16 AM
Hi David,
I noticed you have a k9 image on your router, are you by any chance using IPSEC to and from the router.
Also out of interest why do you have 300 statics NATs on your device? Are you hosting externally accessed web services or similar?
Each NAT takes up a portion of memory as its permanently in the NAT table, could you use dynamic NAT in your network?
Rgds
PJD
07-21-2005 03:08 AM
the k9 is only the last ios tested.
i also tried a simple c3640-is-mz.123-15.bin (IP/PLUS) but my problems remains..
i have a couple of iis server with multiple domain mapped with static nat in external dns.
do you think that a pix 525 can solve my performance problems?
thank you very much
davide
07-21-2005 05:22 AM
A pix525 will certainly do. Even an pix515E should be more then enough for your requirments.
But you might still consider the pix525 if ur expecting more growth in the future.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide