
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-17-2012 10:16 AM - edited 03-04-2019 06:25 PM
I am preparing for my ccie certification exam. and i am currently practicing bgp. I have a few questions regarding the bgp lab ( http://www.ibrahimhasan.com/content/lab-32-0 ). On task#4, is there any way that you could filter route advertisment outside of local AS without using prefix-lists or any type of filters?
Secondly, in http://ibrahim.drupalgardens.com/content/lab-31-0 task#3 is "network 150.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 route-map SET-COMMUNITY" correct? or are there any way you could send a community string without using a route-map?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Routing Protocols
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-17-2012 11:06 AM
Hello John,
studying theory is needed to be able to understand the requirements
A)
>> Ensure that these prefixes are NEVER advertised out of AS 254
calls for BGP well known community NO-EXPORT to be set on these routes
B)
your understanding is correct the use of a route-map invoked in the network command looks like the only available option given the constraints
>> you are NOT allowed to use outbound or inbound route-maps when completing this task
Hope to help
Giuseppe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-17-2012 12:03 PM
Hello John,
if you use the network 150.x.x.0 mask 255.255.255.0 route-map SET-COM on all routers in AS 254
where
route-map SET-COM permit 10
set community no-export
all the BGP prefixes are propagated within AS 254 in iBGP but not to future eBGP neighbors
Your note is valid when we set the BGP community on a route-map applied outbound to an eBGP neighbor. Here you are just required to modify the route-map of previous lab 31 invoked in BGP network command.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-17-2012 11:06 AM
Hello John,
studying theory is needed to be able to understand the requirements
A)
>> Ensure that these prefixes are NEVER advertised out of AS 254
calls for BGP well known community NO-EXPORT to be set on these routes
B)
your understanding is correct the use of a route-map invoked in the network command looks like the only available option given the constraints
>> you are NOT allowed to use outbound or inbound route-maps when completing this task
Hope to help
Giuseppe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-17-2012 11:37 AM
Hi,
wait a moment. I think using NO-EXPORT would still advertise the prefix from AS 254. But this prefixes will not be propagated outside the ISP's AS. See example below.
AS 254 <-----> AS 1234 <-----> AS 456
Setting no export at AS 254. In this scenario, AS 1234 would still receive the prefix. but AS 1234 will not advertise it to AS 456. So I think no-export is not the solution to this problem.
any thoughts? :-)
the requirement is "NEVER advertised out of AS 254"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-17-2012 12:03 PM
Hello John,
if you use the network 150.x.x.0 mask 255.255.255.0 route-map SET-COM on all routers in AS 254
where
route-map SET-COM permit 10
set community no-export
all the BGP prefixes are propagated within AS 254 in iBGP but not to future eBGP neighbors
Your note is valid when we set the BGP community on a route-map applied outbound to an eBGP neighbor. Here you are just required to modify the route-map of previous lab 31 invoked in BGP network command.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-17-2012 02:20 PM
i see. it works. thanks for your help. :-)
