06-27-2018 11:10 AM - edited 03-05-2019 10:40 AM
Good Day,
We are currently working on implementing Unified Communications in our environment with ISR 4400 Routers.
CON-ECMU-C1A4400S - Advance UC perpetual License ISR 4400
CON-ECMU-C1F1PISR - Foundation Perpetual License ISR 4400
At this time my boss is looking at the cost of Cisco ONE with either a 1 year or 3 Year Option and wanted to know the drawbacks to not continuing with Cisco ONE.
I have been searching through the Cisco One Documents scattered across cisco.com and have found the information to be quite convoluted. So I apologize in advance if this is information I should have been able to gather from the PDFs available.
My Apologies if the above seems confusing. Still trying to wrap my head around all these different SKUS and Licenses.
Thank you for taking your time to read my post, I will try to answer any questions as quickly as possible.
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-27-2018 02:34 PM
I agree that Cisco licensing and maintenance agreements are quite complex and can be difficult to evaluate. Here is my perspective, which I hope will be helpful.
First we need to understand that in terms of Cisco maintenance agreements there are traditional maintenance agreements and there is Cisco One. Probably your first decision will be about whether to purchase some maintenance agreement or not. With a maintenance agreement you are purchasing protection against any hardware failure and you are purchasing the ability to obtain and implement software upgrades, and you are purchasing the ability to get software support (to open a case with Cisco TAC if something is not working). Cisco maintenance agreements are fairly expensive. But I tell my customers that it is usually money well spent. So you and your boss need to decide whether to purchase a maintenance agreement.
If your decision is to purchase a maintenance agreement then you need to decide whether to purchase a traditional maintenance agreement or to purchase Cisco One. If you choose the alternative of traditional contract then you will need to purchase (and periodically renew) individual software maintenance and licenses for the features that you need. With Cisco One I see a couple of advantages - there is a bundling of software maintenance and licensing (which I believe can be advantageous), - and there is portability (which to me is the most significant factor). You are implementing a 4400 router. At some point it will need to be replaced. At that point, if you chose the traditional maintenance contract, you start over again, having to purchase licenses again (the money you spent on licenses for the 4400 is gone and you start over again with licenses for the new router). But if you chose Cisco One then the licenses you have purchased for the 4400 will transfer to the new router. I can not address the mechanism by which this happens (I have not yet had that experience). But it seems to me to be a very convincing reason to choose Cisco One option.
HTH
Rick
06-27-2018 11:17 AM
Please read this: Get a Free ISR 4331
06-27-2018 02:34 PM
I agree that Cisco licensing and maintenance agreements are quite complex and can be difficult to evaluate. Here is my perspective, which I hope will be helpful.
First we need to understand that in terms of Cisco maintenance agreements there are traditional maintenance agreements and there is Cisco One. Probably your first decision will be about whether to purchase some maintenance agreement or not. With a maintenance agreement you are purchasing protection against any hardware failure and you are purchasing the ability to obtain and implement software upgrades, and you are purchasing the ability to get software support (to open a case with Cisco TAC if something is not working). Cisco maintenance agreements are fairly expensive. But I tell my customers that it is usually money well spent. So you and your boss need to decide whether to purchase a maintenance agreement.
If your decision is to purchase a maintenance agreement then you need to decide whether to purchase a traditional maintenance agreement or to purchase Cisco One. If you choose the alternative of traditional contract then you will need to purchase (and periodically renew) individual software maintenance and licenses for the features that you need. With Cisco One I see a couple of advantages - there is a bundling of software maintenance and licensing (which I believe can be advantageous), - and there is portability (which to me is the most significant factor). You are implementing a 4400 router. At some point it will need to be replaced. At that point, if you chose the traditional maintenance contract, you start over again, having to purchase licenses again (the money you spent on licenses for the 4400 is gone and you start over again with licenses for the new router). But if you chose Cisco One then the licenses you have purchased for the 4400 will transfer to the new router. I can not address the mechanism by which this happens (I have not yet had that experience). But it seems to me to be a very convincing reason to choose Cisco One option.
HTH
Rick
06-28-2018 01:37 AM
@Richard Burts wrote:
I agree that Cisco licensing and maintenance agreements are quite complex and can be difficult to evaluate.
Cisco will add a new CCIE stream & it will called CCIE-Licensing (aka CCIE-ONE).
Here's the rub: Yearly re-certification (instead of every 3 years) and all modules must be a pass, or else ...
06-28-2018 06:55 AM
06-28-2018 08:30 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide