01-11-2016 05:34 AM - edited 03-05-2019 03:05 AM
Recently, we’ve experienced some flapping on our internet facing interface. I noticed the “Lost Carrier” counter increasing. After swapping our cable and the ISP testing their equipment and cabling, no problems found, they suggested I needed to put a shaper on the interface.
I’m not terribly familiar with shapers other than the reading I’ve done this weekend.
Better to do average or peak setting? Would I want to apply the service-policy both inbound and outbound? (I would think LAN speed choked down to MB would be the problem and need for shaping)
Here’s what I was thinking for a 50MB circuit. Any input is appreciated!
policy-map 50MB_SHAPER
class class-default
shape average 50000000
interface gigabitethernet 0/1
service-policy output 50MB_SHAPER
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-11-2016 07:07 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
I would be nice if your ISP explained why a shaper would preclude interface flaps.
If your Internet connection only provides X amount of bandwidth, which is less than what the physical interface supports, a shaper can be used to manage your available bandwidth.
To some of your other questions, you can only shape egress, although you can police ingress or egress. Normally, when using a shaper, you would use the "average" variant.
Many shapers don't appear to allow for L2 overhead, which often is what CIRs really describe. So, sometimes you need to shape slower than your nominal CIR bandwidth. (10 or 15% usually works well.)
01-11-2016 06:14 AM
Also, does anyone have any ideas of why the interface would be flapping in the first place. I am not seeing the circuit maxed when the link goes down. The CPU is always bored. This is a 3845 router with 1GB RAM.
01-11-2016 07:07 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
I would be nice if your ISP explained why a shaper would preclude interface flaps.
If your Internet connection only provides X amount of bandwidth, which is less than what the physical interface supports, a shaper can be used to manage your available bandwidth.
To some of your other questions, you can only shape egress, although you can police ingress or egress. Normally, when using a shaper, you would use the "average" variant.
Many shapers don't appear to allow for L2 overhead, which often is what CIRs really describe. So, sometimes you need to shape slower than your nominal CIR bandwidth. (10 or 15% usually works well.)
01-11-2016 07:30 AM
I think they are grasping to offer a solution after all their testing showed up clean. They looked at utilization reports and saw one or two days where the max traffic spiked to near the circuit capacity and so they offered the shaper as the next step though, I know the flapping has occurred at times that we were not near capacity on the circuit.
Thanks for the info.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide