cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
671
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

Conditional Response Mode in EIGRP -- Need clarification

fernster
Level 1
Level 1

I have tried searching the CCO for a good explanation on this topic. While have the just of it, I would like to see if anyone can give a good in depth explanation or point me to a resource within the Cisco web site to get information on it. Thank you.

3 Replies 3

ruwhite
Level 7
Level 7

I don't know of any good place to point you to, but I can explain it here. Assume you have three routers on a broadcast segment, A, B, and C.

-- A sends out some reliable packet (it could be an update, query, etc--anything reliable).

-- B acknowledges the packet, but C doesn't.

-- A's retransmission timer counts, and then expires (this timer is actually bound up with the multicast flow timer and the RTO, but I won't confuse the issue with all the relationships there).

-- A will then send out a hello with the CR (conditional receive) bit set, and a list of neighbors that should not pay attention to future multicast packets. C would be on this list, since we are unicasting to C.

-- A will now begin unicasting missed packets to C. If new updates are queued for transmission on the link, A will multicast these to the other routers on the link (B, in this case). A will also unicast these packets to C, waiting for C to ack each one.

-- When A has received an ack for all outstanding routing information queued for transmission from C, it will send out a new hello with the CR bit set, and an empty list of neighbors that should ignore multicast from A. This clears the CR mode.

HTH

:-)

Russ.W

Hi Russ,

So,

Is it correct to say that B (the normal router still receiving multicast RTP packets) is in CR mode or C (the multicast non-responsive router now receiving unicast RTP packets) is in CR mode?

I get confused when people refer to

" a router in CR mode "

Could you help with this?

Kind regards,

Ken

Well,

fernster did not ACK the forum message of Russ ... maybe he understood and they went into CR mode (email??)? ;-)

Cheers

Martin