04-20-2008 09:33 AM - edited 03-03-2019 09:38 PM
HI all,
I have a remote router (R1) with 2 neighbors routers (R2 & R3) using EIGRP. EIGRP chooses R2 as its default route.
My questions is, what would be the effect in the default route if i used the "distribute-list" command in R1 due to a bouncing link between R1 and R2?
Ex. R1(config)# access?list 20 deny any
R1(config)# router eigrp 1
R1(config?router)# no passive?interface serial 0
R1(config?router)# distribute?list 20 out serial 0
I know that when the distribute-list command is configured on an interface, all outgoing routing updates only will be blocked and all incoming routing updates will be allowed, making R2 continuously send routing updates to R1.
Thanks
04-20-2008 11:45 AM
Your understanding is correct.
R1 and R2 would still establish EIGRP adjacency. However, your distribute list would prevent routing updates from being sent out serial 0 on R1 but it would still accept routes learned from neighbor(s) connected via serial 0. Distribute list is direction based (in or out). Hence, 'distribute list out' would in no way affect the routes that are learned from the neighbors.
HTH
Sundar
04-22-2008 08:20 AM
Thanks Sundar for clearing things up.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide