11-11-2015 05:48 AM - edited 03-05-2019 02:43 AM
Hi,
Consider I have this scenario
ISP1 ISP2
| |
|___rtr____|
I would like to use ISP1 as primary and ISP2 as secondary. So i thought of using two static routes with higher metric. I also thought about using ip sla. How do i go about about using ip sla with the above scenario. this traffic is tunnelled traffic (Dmvpn) so no outside traffic to internet so need of nat
Thanks
11-11-2015 06:20 AM
Hey use ip sla with tracking and track a route upstream in the internet with ISP1 , when that route is no longer reachable it will fail to 2nd ISP
quick example with config in this link
http://www.firewall.cx/cisco-technical-knowledgebase/cisco-routers/813-cisco-router-ipsla-basic.html
another option is use both ISP links at same time and allow cef to load balance rather than keeping 1 link redundent
11-11-2015 06:30 AM
Thanks Mark. I am using DMVPN so no nat needed (as all traffic is pushed through DMVPN) - for ISP 1 I have a tunnel interface 1 with source interface as GI0/1 (ISP1) - Will i be able to apply a second souce interface as Gi0/2 (ISP2) under same tunnel interface 1 ? I suspect not.
if I create a second tunnel (Tunnel2) and set ip sla, will the second tunnel be only formed if IP Sla fails ?
11-11-2015 06:44 AM
hey im pretty sure from what i remember only 1 source per physical interface
the 2nd tunnel should form with or without ip sla
the ip sla is just a monitoring function and working with tracking will just redirect traffic to the 2nd ISP link when a failure occurs , the tunnels should have no dependency on ip sla to form
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide