cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
788
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

EIGRP configuration

Klb01261
Level 1
Level 1

I'm working on a simple EIGRP configuration between Routers 1,2, and 3 but cannot ping successfully. I am relatively new to this, and I know I've missed something. Any help would really be appreciated. I'm attaching an image of the packet tracer.

 

sh ip route

Router1

Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0

 

50.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets

D 50.50.50.0 [90/158720] via 192.168.10.2, 00:28:34, FastEthernet0/0

150.150.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks

D 150.150.0.0/16 [90/35840] via 192.168.10.2, 00:28:34, FastEthernet0/0

D 150.150.150.0/24 [90/30720] via 192.168.10.2, 00:28:35, FastEthernet0/0

192.168.10.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets

C 192.168.10.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0

D 192.168.10.4 [90/30720] via 192.168.10.2, 00:28:35, FastEthernet0/0

C 200.200.200.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1

S* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0

 

Router 2

Gateway of last resort is 192.168.10.1 to network 0.0.0.0

 

50.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets

D 50.50.50.0 [90/156160] via 192.168.10.6, 00:29:27, FastEthernet0/1

150.150.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks

D 150.150.0.0/16 [90/33280] via 192.168.10.6, 00:29:27, FastEthernet0/1

C 150.150.150.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0

192.168.10.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets

C 192.168.10.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0

C 192.168.10.4 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1

D 200.200.200.0/24 [90/30720] via 192.168.10.1, 00:29:26, FastEthernet0/0

D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/53760] via 192.168.10.1, 00:29:27, FastEthernet0/0

 

Router 3

Gateway of last resort is 192.168.10.5 to network 0.0.0.0

 

50.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets

C 50.50.50.0 is directly connected, Loopback1

100.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets

C 100.100.100.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0/0

150.150.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks

D 150.150.0.0/16 is a summary, 02:53:26, Null0

D 150.150.150.0/24 [90/30720] via 192.168.10.5, 00:29:54, FastEthernet0/1

192.168.10.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets

D 192.168.10.0 [90/30720] via 192.168.10.5, 00:29:54, FastEthernet0/1

C 192.168.10.4 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1

D 200.200.200.0/24 [90/33280] via 192.168.10.5, 00:29:53, FastEthernet0/1

D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/56320] via 192.168.10.5, 00:29:53, FastEthernet0/1

3 Replies 3

Hello 

You mention simple eigp topology however from your posted output i can see at least summary routes being advertised and redistribution occurring.


It looks like a PKT tracer topology can you either post the PKT file or the running config of the rtrs in question for evaluation?


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

Here is the packet tracer file. I suppose "simple" was a bit misleading. The EIGRP portion is part of a larger project I'm working on. Thanks for the reply.

Hi @Klb01261 ,

 

I have reviewed your exercise and I have corrected this:


-The Gateway of the PCs must match with the IP configured in the router interfaces.
-The default static route must have in the border router and only that router must propagate it to the other router.

I have attached the exercise with the corrections.

 

Regards

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card