cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
553
Views
0
Helpful
0
Replies

extcommunity-list no matches

Hi,

I have the following configuration for a RT translation but seems not working:

ip extcommunity-list standard RT-TRANSLATION-IN permit rt 2:200

route-map RM-RT-TRANSLATION-IN permit 10
match extcommunity RT-TRANSLATION-IN
set extcommunity rt 2:202

address-family vpnv4
[...]
neighbor 192.168.17.5 activate
neighbor 192.168.17.5 send-community both
neighbor 192.168.17.5 route-map RM-RT-TRANSLATION-IN in
exit-address-family

On ASBR I can see the route-map counter at zero:


ASBR-R7#show route-map
route-map RM-RT-TRANSLATION-IN, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
extcommunity (extcommunity-list filter):RT-TRANSLATION-IN
Set clauses:
extended community RT:2:202
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes

On ASBR's neighbor I can see the route imported with the "wrong"  RT (10.0.20.0 should have from rt 2:200 to rt: 2:202)

Route Distinguisher: 2:200

*>i10.0.20.0/24 7.7.7.7 0 100 0 65000 ?
Route Distinguisher: 2:202
*>i10.0.15.0/24 4.4.4.4 2662400 100 0 ?

However, on PE router I can see that it recognizes the route under the right VRF despite the wrong rt

Route Distinguisher: 2:200
*>i 10.0.20.0/24 7.7.7.7 0 100 0 65000 ?
Route Distinguisher: 2:202 (default for vrf BLUE)
*> 10.0.15.0/24 192.168.45.6 2662400 32768 ?
*>i 10.0.20.0/24 7.7.7.7 0 100 0 65000 ?

Can someone explain me why:

  • Route-Map doesn't work
  • PE imports the route under the right VRF despite the wrong RT

I can tell you that:

  • The route is received correctly with the rt 2:200 (verified via pcap trace)
  • The PE's VRF import target only 2:202

Thanks

0 Replies 0
Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card