03-12-2025 08:55 AM
Hello,
I need to setup a Failover on an ISR1117-4P router using GRE Tunnels. The WAN1 Connection is 500/500M, can the GRE tunnels give that much througput or will they become a bottleneck? Thank you..
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-12-2025 03:55 PM - edited 03-12-2025 06:02 PM
BTW, your model's performance:
Table 26. Cisco 111x ISR Autonomous Mode (non-SD-WAN) performance specifications – 17.9 Release (Bidirectional)
Feature |
C111x-8P |
C111x-4P |
IPv4 forwarding throughput (IMIX) |
1673 Mbps |
1372 Mbps |
IPsec throughput (multi tunnel, IMIX) |
468 Mbps |
370 Mbps |
Number of IPsec IPv4 tunnels |
100 |
100 |
As long as tunnel is just GRE, not GRE/IPSec, looks adequate for 500/500.
03-12-2025 09:19 AM
If the routers are capable (I haven't checked that model's performance specs) pushing a gig+, GRE doesn't have to be a major impediment.
You'll lose bandwidth to GRE overhead (becomes more significant as the packet becomes smaller), but the real threat to GRE is fragmentation, more so in a failover role impacting already active flows.
03-12-2025 03:55 PM - edited 03-12-2025 06:02 PM
BTW, your model's performance:
Table 26. Cisco 111x ISR Autonomous Mode (non-SD-WAN) performance specifications – 17.9 Release (Bidirectional)
Feature |
C111x-8P |
C111x-4P |
IPv4 forwarding throughput (IMIX) |
1673 Mbps |
1372 Mbps |
IPsec throughput (multi tunnel, IMIX) |
468 Mbps |
370 Mbps |
Number of IPsec IPv4 tunnels |
100 |
100 |
As long as tunnel is just GRE, not GRE/IPSec, looks adequate for 500/500.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide