cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
757
Views
2
Helpful
35
Replies

ISSUE WITH NAT ON A STICK using Loopback

JUANNN
Level 1
Level 1

Hello,

I am doing both on CML and on hardware the following configuration:

JUANNN_3-1735018571502.png

The goal is to configure NAT on the NAT_ROUTER using only 1 physical interface (G1.10), which will be on the INSIDE.

JUANNN_4-1735018618815.png

I have tried it with 2 subinterfaces, one as inside and one as outside, and it worked.

However, the next step is to get it to work using only 1 subinterface. For this, I created a Loopback interface and set it as the OUTSIDE:

JUANNN_5-1735018672557.png

Since the traffic from the users (from HOST1 which is in vlan 10.0.0.0 /24, and HOST1 has an interface VLAN 10 emulating a host with IP address 10.0.0.2 /24) gets routed before NATed when it goes through G1.10, I configued PBR to match that traffic (as you can see in the G1.10 screenshot) and place it on the loopback interface, which is on the OUTSIDE (next hop set by PBR is in network directly connected to lo0, 10.0.1.0 /30), so that way it gets NATed before routed:

JUANNN_6-1735018714432.png

JUANNN_7-1735018732315.png

Once my traffic with source 10.0.0.2 is placed in the loopback 0 interface on the OUTSIDE, NAT takes place and applies the following:

JUANNN_8-1735018761604.png

The source of my traffic from HOST 1 now should be 192.168.1.3. The destination is (for example) 100.100.100.100 (INET_SERV). The NAT router then routes traffic using the default route pointing to CMTS:

JUANNN_9-1735018791637.png

which is successfully installed in the RIB (in case someone was doubting). Once the traffic gets to CMTS, the rest of the path to INET_SERV is fine.

On the way back to HOST1, traffic from CMTS coming from INET_SERV has a source of 100.100.100.100 and a destination of 192.168.1.3. It gets to G1.10, but again matches PBR and gets placed on the loopback 0 interface:

JUANNN_10-1735018831067.png

Once traffic gets placed to the loopback0 interface, again is NATed before routed,. Since traffic has now a source of 100.100.100.100 and destination of 192.168.1.3, it should match the following NAT rule:

JUANNN_11-1735018855815.png

and the destination IP address of traffic should be translated to 10.0.0.2, which is HOST1 IP address, and finally traffic should get routed back to HOST1.

However, I might be doing something wrong or misunderstanding NAT or PBR, because traffic from HOST1 to INET SERV is reaching INET SERV, but NAT is not translating traffic in the NAT router. On the packet captures that I have done in the link between CMTS and INET_SERV, I see the ICMP request with source 10.0.0.2 and destination 100.100.100.100, which means that traffic goes through NAT router without getting translated. Traffic the cannot make it back since INET_SERV does not have a route to 10.0.0.0 /24. I know I could configure NAT on CMTS or a route to 10.0.0.0 /24 on INET_SERV to solve this, but the goal is to solve it from the NAT router.

I have tried this on hardware (CISCO 3650 port switch as L2SW and C1121X routers) and software (CML2.7.2) and no success. I have been stuck with this countless hours for many days.

 

Anyone knows what could be wrong, or if I am misunderstanding anything?

 

Thanks, any help is appreciated,

Juan

 

 

 

35 Replies 35

 @JUANNN  please use the cfg i provided that is based in your OP 
can you confirm if you tried using the set ip nexthop 1.1.1.1 instead of the set interface loopback x  in the Route-map - it may not work 


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

Hello Paul

I used your cfg but it didn't work. I will try your cfg again, and also on hardware. 

Hello
fyi i have just managed to lab this up in EVE from my own sanity and it did work  accordingly so it must be your CML software negating it 


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

JUANNN
Level 1
Level 1

Hello,

Things are looking almost perfect now.

I have followed the Cisco cfgs and CML now shows me NAT translations done correctly, PBR working properly even with a tunnel interface and packets from Host1 reaching CMTS lo0 ip add (6.6.6.6) and CMTS does NOT have a route to 10.0.0.0/24.

NAT ROUTER cfgs

JUANNN_0-1735057486268.png

JUANNN_1-1735057548117.png

Here are the packet captures that prove that NAT is working. Note that 10.0.0.2 is Host1 and 10.0.0.1 is NAT router G1 primary IP:

JUANNN_2-1735057647728.png

But like I said, is almost perfect. The problem, as you can see, is that I am missing the last ICMP reply that is supposed to be 

- source: 6.6.6.6

- dest: 10.0.0.2

So there is still a little issue in NAT router when returning traffic from CMTS comes back. Any thougths? I will try using loopback instead of tunnel, and check ACLs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friend 

Now you missing 

Ip nat outside under LO

Add it if not work' then sorry I dont have time to continue troubleshoot issue.

Thanks for understanding

MHM

JUANNN
Level 1
Level 1

JUANNN_0-1735058782594.png

JUANNN_1-1735059203946.png

There it is my friends, the end of this painful but interesting LAB. This was the missing command that Cisco does not include in their configs, and is the key to understand how PBR works with NAT: (from what I can deduct): 

1. Traffic from Host1 with source 10.0.0.2 and dest 6.6.6.6 enters NATrouter via G1, INSIDE

2. PBR goes before Routing Table Routing and before NAT on the INSIDE, so traffic is routed to interface tunnel 100, which is on the OUTSIDE. On that trip inside-outside, traffic source gets translated by NAT from 10.0.0.2 to 192.168.2.2. 

3. Once in the OUTSIDE on interface tunnel 100, traffic gets routed using the default route to CMTS, and reaches 6.6.6.6. This means that even if NAT attempts to act in the OUSTIDE-INSIDE trip (from int tunnel to G1) it would NOT matter because the ACL 10 does not match the traffic with source 192.168.1.2 destination 6.6.6.6.

4. Traffic returns from CMTS to NATrouter, traffic has source 6.6.6.6 dest 192.168.2.2. Enters G1 INSIDE, PBR takes place (ACL 102 matches also this traffic) and routes traffic to int tunnel 100. NAT acts again in this INSIDE OUTSIDE trip with the command that I just added, changing destination of trafffic from 192.168.2.2 to 10.0.0.2. 

5. Finally, traffic departs from int tunnel 100 towards 10.0.0.2, and source remains 6.6.6.6 It does not match any NAT ACL, so NAT does not act on this OUTSIDE-INSIDE trip, and then traffic gets sent to Host1!!

 

JUANNN_2-1735059896886.png

JUANNN_3-1735059940931.png

 

After 12 hours on my own and almost 12 hours on the Cisco Community, there is a soultion that works and makes sense. 

Thanks to Paul Driver and MHM for their interest and dedication.

Regards,

juan

 

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card